Christie’s slammed for selling jewels of Nazi profiteer

Helmut Horten became wealthy in the 1930s by buying German Jewish businesses at a fraction of their value from owners forced to sell.

By Batya Jerenberg, World Israel News

Famed auction house Christie’s was criticized Wednesday for the launching of a sale of jewels owned by the widow of a Nazi profiteer who became wealthy by taking advantage of Jews who were forced to sell their businesses in Germany and other countries both prior and during World War II.

Helmut Horten started his buying spree in 1933, after the Nazis passed a law stating that only Aryans were permitted to own companies, Dutch historian David De Jong told the New York Post. De Jong wrote about Horten’s empire-building in his recently published book, “Nazi Billionaires: The Dark History of Germany’s Wealthiest Dynasties.”

Coerced by the authorities or Horten himself, he “would often buy businesses for 65 percent of their value,” said De Jong. “Jewish families sold their companies to get the hell out of Germany.”

The historian said that although Horten became a member of the Nazi party in 1937, he did so out of greed and not because he believed in its ideology.

“He was a sheer opportunist who saw an opportunity to grow from a small business owner to a department store mogul by the end of World War II.”

Horten then expanded his reach to German-occupied Amsterdam, where the Nazi authorities coerced department-store owners to sell their businesses to him.

Author Stephanie Stephan wrote a book about how Horten worked his deals, since her father worked in Amsterdam’s largest department store and was fired because he had “advised the owner not to sell,” she told the Post.

Horten bought the store at a low price. After the war, Stephan’s father filed a lawsuit in Germany against Horten but lost, “since most of the judges were old Nazis, and Horten had good relationships with them,” she said.

Stephan slammed the auction house for how it has dealt with the issue.

“For Christie’s, this auction is a matter of prestige and a matter of sales,” she told the Post. “[There was] no word about the past in their first announcement of the auction. They should have pointed out the history of Helmut Horten before…. The basis of his fortune was money extorted from Jewish property. This fact only did make [it] possible to buy jewelry and art to such an extent.”

Christie’s issued several statements in its defense.

CEO Guillaume Cerutti said the company is “aware” of “the well-documented business practices of Mrs. Horten’s late first husband during the Nazi era when he purchased Jewish businesses sold under duress.” All the proceeds from the sale, he said, “will be directed to a foundation which supports philanthropic causes, including healthcare, children’s welfare and access to the arts.”

According to estimates, the sparkly estate of Heidi Horten, who married Helmut Horten in 1966 when she was 19 and he was around 50, will fetch some $150 million. Among the many items is a 90-carat Briolette of India necklace believed to have once been owned by Richard the Lionheart and Eleanor of Aquitaine, which is valued at up to $15.6 million alone.

Whether the billionaire heiress knew how her husband amassed his fortune is open to question, but both Stephan and De Jong believe she did, as she had once engaged a historian to research his past. The subsequent report understated his profiteering, which didn’t surprise Stephan at all.

“It was clear to me that she wanted Helmut’s past to be put in a better light and glossed over,” she said.

There is no question that the jewelry was all bought legally. It is only the source of the wealth that allowed these purchases that buyers may – or may not – find repugnant.

The post Christie’s slammed for selling jewels of Nazi profiteer appeared first on World Israel News.

On Russia-South Africa/Africa

South Africa-Russia relations are not new. They date back decades before South Africa arrived at a democratic dispensation in 1994; a journey in which Russia provided a lot of support. During the recent visit to South Africa of Russian Foreign Affairs Minister Sergey Lavrov, it was agreed that the two countries need to further deepen relations and cooperation in most spheres, including political, economic, security and social ones, as well as in multilateral and international forums

Israelis temporarily united by war – but what’s next?

Can the spirit of national unity last for more than a few days, considering that talks aimed at securing a compromise on judicial reform are reportedly failing?

By Lauren Marcus, World Israel News

After a Memorial Day which saw stark politicization of the typically somber occasion, including unprecedented clashes in military cemeteries between bereaved families with differing political opinions and lawmakers dropping out of ceremonies in which they normally participate due to political tensions, many bemoaned the prevalent feeling of disunity within Israeli society.

But a recent flare-up with terrorists in the Gaza Strip served as a rallying point for Israelis, with lawmakers from all sides of the political spectrum publicly supporting the Israeli military and offering their support to residents of southern Negev communities, who were bombarded by more than 100 rockets in a one-day span.

Even Opposition Leader Yair Lapid, who recently rebuffed calls for a pause to anti-government protests on Israel’s Independence Day, took to Twitter to emphasize his support for the government in a military context.

“The opposition will support the government in any military action that will bring peace and security to the residents of the south,” he wrote on Tuesday evening.

His sentiments were echoed by other opposition parties, who called for the Israeli military to protect citizens in the Negev.

Lapid, who is a longtime political enemy of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has spent much of his time in recent months agitating against the premier and right-wing voters, steadfastly refusing to tone down his rhetoric for the sake of national unity.

The question now is whether this spirit of unity can survive more than a few days, considering that negotiations regarding a compromise on judicial reform have reportedly gone off the rails.

Opponents of the reform have framed the legislation, which would create changes to Israel’s legal system that would curb the powers of the Supreme Court and see elected officials wield greater influence over the courts, as an existential threat to the State of Israel.

Many judicial reform opponents have said that a compromise isn’t a viable option, and that they will only cease their disruptive demonstrations should the legislation be shelved entirely.

With this rhetoric coming from the protest movement’s leaders, along with the demonization of voters and lawmakers who support the reform, it’s unclear if Israelis can move forward as a untied bloc when dealing with other pressing issues, such as the soaring cost of living, housing crisis and lay-offs in the tech industry.

Based on a prediction from Sderot Mayor Alon Davidi, there will likely be fresh round of fighting with Gaza in the summer – so it may be just a matter of time before another clash brings the country together once again.

The post Israelis temporarily united by war – but what’s next? appeared first on World Israel News.

IDF concerned over poor Iron Dome interception rate – report

Six Hamas rockets reportedly got through out of 16 heading for populated areas in the last day.

By Batya Jerenberg, World Israel News

The IDF is currently investigating why the Iron Dome anti-missile system recorded a much poorer interception rate than usual after six of the 104 rockets Hamas launched at southern Israel on Tuesday hit populated areas, Hebrew-language Ynet reported Tuesday.

In one round of 22 rockets, two out of six heading for the town of Sderot were not intercepted. One struck a construction site, wounding three Chinese employees, one of them seriously. Two others were also brought to the hospital with various light injuries. Another hit the garden of a home.

Although the young son of the family said they had only a few seconds’ warning from the air-raid sirens, his family managed to reach the safe room and were not hurt in the subsequent explosion right outside their house. Cars were among the property damaged by the shrapnel.

In another round of 26 launches, only six out of 10 heading for built-up areas were destroyed by Iron Dome interceptors, the report said. A few people were brought to hospital suffering from panic attacks after the barrages.

A 62.5% success rate is far below the average of 96% that the Iron Dome enjoyed during the 55-hour period of last August’s Operation Breaking Dawn, when some 1,100 rockets were launched out of the Gaza Strip by Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ).

The IDF, however, issued a newer statement Wednesday morning that the Iron Dome intercepted 24 of the projectiles, marking a 90% interception rate of rockets heading for populated areas. Another 48 projectiles landed in open areas in southern Israel, 14 fell short in Gaza, 11 landed in the sea, and another seven had unknown impact sites, IDF spokesman Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari told reporters.

During Operation Guardian of the Walls in May 2021, some 3,400 Hamas rockets and mortars crossed the Israeli border, with the IDF reporting that the Iron Dome had about a 90% success rate against those heading for populated areas.

Israel’s Defense Ministry and defense company Rafael are reportedly close to completing a laser system that would be able to destroy airborne threats with 100 kilowatts of heat concentrated into a beam the diameter of a 10-shekel coin. Called “Light Shield” or “Iron Beam,” it will complement the Iron Dome system, as it cannot work as well as a physical interceptor in bad weather conditions.

The post IDF concerned over poor Iron Dome interception rate – report appeared first on World Israel News.

National security minister to boycott Knesset votes over ‘weak response in Gaza’

“Following the weak response in Gaza tonight, the Otzma Yehudit faction decided not to attend the Knesset votes today, and will hold a special faction meeting in the city of Sderot,” Ben-Gvir stated.

By Pesach Benson, TPS

Israel’s National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir said his right-wing Otzma Yehudit party will boycott Knesset votes on Wednesday over what he called the government’s “weak response in Gaza.”

“Following the weak response in Gaza tonight, the Otzma Yehudit faction decided not to attend the Knesset votes today, and will hold a special faction meeting in the city of Sderot.”

Gaza terror groups fired rockets at Israel on Tuesday morning following the death of Sheikh Khader Adnan in an Israeli prison. Adnan, a senior figure in the Palestinian Islamic Jihad terror group, had refused to eat for 86 days when he was found in his prison cell at the Nitzan Prison.

The 45-year-old Adnan spent many years in Israeli prisons during 10 different terms. He popularized the use of hunger strikes by Palestinian prisoners.

He was most recently arrested in February for suspected membership in a terror group, support for a terrorist organization and incitement.

Palestinians fired more rockets on Tuesday, prompting Israeli air strikes on Hamas positions in Gaza. Israel holds Hamas responsible for all rocket fire coming from the Strip. The Israel Defense Forces confirmed that 104 rockets were launched.

Israel confirmed striking Gaza facilities for weapons production and storage, a cement factory used for Hamas tunnels and other infrastructure, a tunnel, a Hamas naval outpost and training facilities.

Fighting has ceased amidst unconfirmed media reports of a ceasefire brokered by Egypt, Qatar and the UN.

The Home Front Command lifted restrictions on Gaza area communities and schools. Schools are open and high school students in those areas are due to take matriculation exams. Otzma Yehudit MK Almog Cohen said he discussed with Education Minister Yoav Kisch the possibility of students taking the tests at a later date, given the security situation.

Sderot Mayor Alon Davidi echoed Ben-Gvir’s criticisms.

“The reality is that the Israeli government adopts a policy of granting immunity to terrorists, this is a lax policy for which we will pay a price this summer,” Davidi said.

“Hamas and Jihad did what they wanted, they did it last week and they will continue in the future. This is a failed policy. This is a wrong policy of the Prime Minister, the Minister of Defense and the Government of Israel. The terrorists shoot to kill and they do not pay any price. The concept of eliminating terrorists has left the lexicon of the leadership of the State of Israel.”

The post National security minister to boycott Knesset votes over ‘weak response in Gaza’ appeared first on World Israel News.

WATCH: 104 rockets launched from Gaza toward Israel in 24-hours, Israeli response ‘disappointing’

A tentative ceasefire has reportedly been reached between Israel and the Palestinian terror groups in Gaza, following a 24-hour escalation, as residents in border communities return to their daily routines.

“I must admit that the Israeli response was disappointing,” Col. (ret.) Dr. Jacques Neriah tells i24News.

The post WATCH: 104 rockets launched from Gaza toward Israel in 24-hours, Israeli response ‘disappointing’ appeared first on World Israel News.

Cancelling Churchill: Did Sir Winston Cause the Bengal Famine?

April 9th was National Winston Churchill Day, an annual celebration of the life and legacy of Britain’s wartime prime minister. But lately, rather than celebrating Churchill, it has become more fashionable to denigrate him. 

In 2018, Blighty UK, a WWII-themed café in London where customers could drink tea beneath model Spitfires, had a mural of Sir Winston defaced with ‘IMPERIALIST SCUM’. A petition was started by leftist locals to get the café closed, as it “insensitively evoke[d] memory of the [British] Empire,” a subject which “has little to do with cafés.” As the bemused owner of the eatery observed, however, “If you can’t celebrate… Churchill, who can you celebrate? Everyone has flaws.”

Yet to some, flaws are all Sir Winston had. His statues are now regularly vandalized, most famously during Black Lives Matter London protests in 2020, when his effigy in Westminster had its name-plaque spray-painted to read ‘CHURCHILL was a racist’. As Churchill biographer Andrew Roberts memorably commented in response, “If these people think Churchill was a racist, just wait until they hear about the guy he was fighting!” 

Not Their Finest Hour

Ironically, Britain’s leading center of Churchill-bashing today is Churchill College, Cambridge, an institution established in his honor in 1960, which today attracts student mobs of eco-activists and BLM allies who repeatedly deface his bust and signage to draw attention to the way Sir Winston was also somehow apparently responsible for climate-change.

In February 2021 Churchill College hosted a symposium titled ‘The Racial Consequences of Mr Churchill,’ aimed at “giving voice to Black and ethnic minority scholars” to spout nonsense unchallenged. As the College explained: “Sir Winston is often presented as the embodiment of WWII and the UK’s identity, and so … to critically reassess Churchill is to critically reassess a nation’s identity,” namely by making it out as being worse than Nazi Germany.

Feast or Famine?

Misrepresentation of the Bengal Famine is key to the anti-Churchill case promulgated by the activist scholars who gathered at the college which bears their enemy’s name. Contemporary quotes from a stressed Churchill to the effect that the Indians were a “beastly people” who “breed like rabbits” are abused to imply that (as his equally short-tempered political colleague Leo Amery put it in 1944) there was “not much difference between his outlook and Hitler’s” when it came to the allegedly disposable lives of non-whites. But this is simply not true.

The famine was caused by a cyclone ruining Bengali rice-crops, exacerbated by Japan’s invasion of British Burma, formerly a leading exporter of rice regionally. The rest of India should have been able to make up the shortfall, but government had been devolved from London to natives in India’s various regions, many of whom, being of different religions and castes, acted with insufficient urgency and concern to save Bengali lives, or actively hoarded rice to drive up prices and profits – so prejudice was indeed a factor in the famine, but prejudice from other Indians, not white Mr Churchill. 

When Churchill discovered the scale of the crisis, he lobbied Australia to send food-ships – despite the regional presence of Japanese submarines. Churchill did decline to transfer food direct from Britain to India, but only because the Royal Navy was needed back home to facilitate the D-Day landings. Churchill ultimately prioritized saving Europe over Bengal, but not because he hated Bengalis. His harsh words to Leo Amery were just a reflection of his anger at having to make such an impossible choice. In peacetime, he repeatedly praised rabbit-like population-increase in India as a key benefit of “the beneficence and wisdom” of British rule – prior to WWII, the Raj did indeed massively reduce age-old rates of local famine.

Black Marx Against His Name

Predictably, as shown in a report co-authored by Andrew Roberts, the Cambridge symposium featured a litany of other equally spurious claims, including that cowardly Churchill didn’t immediately grab a machine-gun and fight in WWII personally, despite being 64 years old when hostilities began.

But much worse than Churchill’s alleged cowardice was the accusation of one of the alleged scholars involved, Kehinde Andrews, that “The British Empire was far worse than the Nazis. It lasted far longer; it killed far many more people” and actually Hitler was just “copying” it. The Nazi Holocaust of the Jews was no exceptional event, he continued, just “the complete logic of the West,” and “kind of the foundation of what the West is,” particularly Britain’s Evil Empire. 

When the Allies won, “All we really did was we shifted from an old [Nazi] version of white supremacy to a new [Anglo-American] version of white supremacy.” After all, it was explained, Churchill was a eugenicist, just like Hitler – except, as it was disingenuously not explained, Churchill’s eugenics were limited to a brief spell when he thought the mentally disabled should be sterilized, a view he soon recanted, as opposed to Hitler’s rather more extreme belief that everyone non-Aryan should be enslaved or gassed. Following widespread criticism, the symposium was disbanded in June 2021.

Sir Winston Churchill should not be above criticism – but it should be honest criticism. By dishonestly transforming Britain’s greatest war-hero into a genocidal far-right murderer, his detractors seek to transform Britain’s self-image of itself along similar lines, thus helping facilitate their creeping ideological conquest of its institutions, even up to and including Churchill College, Cambridge. 

Where is a politician Churchillian enough today to actually try and stop them?

The post <strong>Cancelling Churchill: Did Sir Winston Cause the Bengal Famine?</strong> appeared first on Providence.