Daniel Imperato – Official Website
Daniel Imperato For President 2024
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Visit …
The post Anzac Day in Australia and New Zealand: The Slaughter of the Unthinking by the Unaccountable appeared first on Global Research.
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Click the share button above to email/forward this article …
The post Black Lives Remain in Danger Throughout the United States appeared first on Global Research.
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Click the share button above to email/forward this article …
The post Blood, Golf and Saudi Arabia: The LIV Tournament in Adelaide appeared first on Global Research.
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Click the share button above to email/forward this article …
The post Prison Letters of Nelson Mandela Revisited appeared first on Global Research.
Tutti gli articoli di Global Research possono essere letti in 51 lingue attivando il pulsante Traduci sito sotto il nome dell’autore.
Per ricevere la newsletter quotidiana di Global Research (articoli selezionati), fare clic qui.
Fai clic sul pulsante di …
The post Ultimo Appello Al Mondo Per Impedire All’oms Di Imprigionare L’umanità appeared first on Global Research.
Paul Ramsey was once the leading voice in Christian ethics in our country. Now, largely forgotten beyond the academy, his insights are needed more than ever as we find ourselves caught between twin temptations: a Reinhold Niebuhrian resignation to the “lesser of two evils” and a Dietrich Bonhoefferian belief in “necessary exceptions” to our best moral reasoning. In his 2015 book, Power and Purpose: Paul Ramsey and Contemporary Political Theology, Adam Hollowell presents a Ramsey who can guide us through this Scylla and Charybdis. Ramsey, sharing Niebuhr and Bonhoeffer’s concerns for political responsibility and protecting the vulnerable, offers an alternative to the all-too-common assumption that Christian faithfulness sometimes requires the abandonment of moral norms.
According to Hollowell, the relationship between creation and covenant drives Ramsey’s ethical reflection. Unlike our run-of-the mill schemas that deploy unnatural dichotomizations of natural and supernatural, justice and love, thus keeping theology at arm’s length from political thought, Ramsey instead brings these things together through his exploration of the unity of creation and covenant.
Drawing upon Karl Barth’s declaration in the Church Dogmatics that creation is “the external basis of covenant” and covenant “the internal basis of creation,” Ramsey affirms, with Barth, that “covenant is the goal of creation [and] not something which is added later to the reality of the creature.” That is, there is no “natural” to be cordoned off entirely from the “supernatural.” After all, the destiny of human nature is to be in covenant with God, or as Thomas Aquinas would put it: to be friends with God. It is the separation of the two, nature and grace, then, that is unnatural.
Likewise, Ramsey says in Christian Ethics and the Sit-In that justice and love are “ultimately inseverable.”Justice is the external basis of love, protecting creation and preserving the possibility of love, which is found in covenant with fellow man. Love is the internal basis for creation, the reason why justice is necessary to preserve love’s place. Both, not just justice, are public, political principles. This means that Ramsey is comfortable exhorting the state to enshrine love in its laws; in fact, justice requires it.
So how does a loving state go to war? As Ramsey insists in The Just War: “what justified also limited.” For Ramsey, love justifies the use of force to protect innocent third parties. But precisely because the justification comes from love, the justification is not limitless. War without limit is a failure of love. Though it may sound odd, limits to war are a form of enemy love!
This is not a refrain to be found in the work of Niebuhr. Love is something the state can only ever approximate; instead, it must settle for earthly justice. Political actions are always marred by the Fall and so in politics we must choose between the lesser of two evils. There is no avoiding sin (sometimes called “dirty hands”) in the public realm. Responsible human beings must acknowledge the necessity of sometimes committing evil, even if it’s the least bad option.
Ramsey, however, takes Paul’s remarks in Romans 3:8 to bind Christian consciences in politics every bit as much as in church and private settings. The apostle condemns those who propose to “do evil that good may come,” which Ramsey generalizes to mean that “it can never be right to do wrong for the sake of some real or supposed good” (The Just War).
Instead of the lesser of two evils, then, Ramsey insists that the Christian pursue the “greatest possible good.” While a Niebuhrian and a Ramseyan might use “least possible evil” and “greatest possible good” to describe the same action, the semantics are important. Christians are not consigned to deny God in every action but are freed to choose the good, to claim otherwise is to deny the significance of the Holy Spirit and God’s promise to deliver Christians from temptation. It is not as if God’s power and promises become invalid as soon as one empties out of the sanctuary into the city square. Ramsey believes in the possibility of faithful Christian presence in the political realm.
Nor does Christ-like love prevent Christians from exercising coercive, even lethal power. This is one of Bonhoeffer’s mistakes. Unlike Niebuhr, his one-time professor at Union Theological Seminary, Bonhoeffer believed that the Sermon on the Mount laid out the pattern of life for Christians, not just in the privacy of the church—as Niebuhr believed—but under every “divine mandate” (the language Bonhoeffer came to prefer in his later work): family, government, church, and work. Christians, he took the Sermon on the Mount to teach, were forbidden from any kind of violence, even when acting as agents of the state, even in defense of others. Caught up as he was in conspiracies to kill Hitler, Bonhoeffer ultimately considered himself culpable of murderous intent. However, Bonhoeffer thought that Christian faithfulness in this uniquely urgent and dire situation require that he willingly take on sin (by conspiring to kill Hitler) in order to protect the victims of the Nazi regime.
In his late, unfinished work, Ethics, Bonhoeffer is dismissive of absolute moral norms. He writes that the faithful person is “not fettered by principles,” for “principles are only tools in the hands of God; they will soon be thrown away when they are no longer useful.” His conception of faithfulness is radically open to divine commands. Principles, he might say, are the refuge of empty religion, a legalistic Pharisaism that vaunts ethical ideals over the real, living God. So, we must be free of them—and to be free of them means to be able to make exceptions, Bonhoeffer thinks. Hence a pacifist abetting the plot to kill Hitler. Despite his pacifism, Bonhoeffer smuggles back in a Niebuhrian disregard for absolute norms by turning to an exception ethic.
This example does not rub most the wrong way because we—unlike Bonhoeffer—may think conspiring against Hitler is a completely justifiable action in itself. We might only think Bonhoeffer was wrong to heap guilt on himself for his involvement, not wrong for being involved. Yet, if this is the case, we ought not to speak of what Bonhoeffer did as a justifiable exception to our moral norms.
As Ramsey makes clear, there is no such thing as a justifiable exception. The very idea is incoherent, for something is either justifiable or it is an exception, that is, unjustifiable. In the case of killing Hitler, one finds justification not in throwing out the rule, but in looking for a deeper, more encompassing moral logic. For example, within the commandment against murder is an injunction to preserve life. It may be possible to uphold the commandment by plotting against a tyrannous ruler, though no measure of life against lives can justify an action that is in itself a moral atrocity.
Rather than looking to exceptions to exempt Christians from following moral norms in some emergency situation, Hollowell argues that Ramseyan love is demonstrated through “deeper and deeper commitments to the covenant bond”: “creativity and flexibility in practical reasoning must stem from a deepening commitment to foundational theological considerations.” Moral creativity and resourcefulness, which faithful actions require, come not from abandoning the rules but from learning to work gracefully within them.
In a time when our national politics leaps from exigency to exigency, taking every situation to be uniquely urgent, we need the cool and careful analysis of a Paul Ramsey. We need a theology that can lay out the boundaries of acceptable Christian action and take political responsibility seriously, but also one that understands the difference Christ makes for all of our moral reasoning.
For the Christian earnestly desiring, as Bonhoeffer puts it in Ethics, to know how to let “the reality of God show itself everywhere to be the ultimate reality” and navigate faithfully amidst the policies and politics of the day, he will find few better guides than Paul Ramsey. Indeed, as we continue to hear prominent Christians advocate for the lesser of two evils, Hollowell’s Power and Purpose offers up a Ramsey who is more needed than ever.
The post Navigating the Scylla and Charybdis: Paul Ramsey and Contemporary Political Theology appeared first on Providence.
Epidemic of 15-19 Year Olds Dropping Dead in Schools and Dorms Across USA and Canada in April 2023
By , April 24, 2023
Found dead in dorm or residence. Cardiac arrest and died while at school. Died …
The post Selected Articles: Epidemic of 15-19 Year Olds Dropping Dead in Schools and Dorms Across USA and Canada in April 2023 appeared first on Global Research.
An Oklahoma man and woman have been arrested and are facing charges over their alleged involvement in the death of a newborn baby. Sarah N. Helton and Kevin R. Helton were arrested for second-degree murder or alternatively one count of child neglect.
The case surrounding the Heltons emerged after a man loaned the couple’s phone and saw a photo of a baby that appeared to be deceased, in addition to messages that discussed the child’s death and the whereabouts of the remains.
According to the probable cause affidavit, authorities suspect Sarah and Kevin Helton caused the baby’s death through neglect between December 26, 2022, and January 10, 2023. Investigators believe that the baby was born in late 2022 in the bedroom of the Heltons’ home. After the baby’s birth, Sarah Helton departed without notice, and Kevin Helton allegedly discovered the baby in the trash days later.
The man who loaned the Heltons’ phone reportedly stated to police that the photo of the baby looked as though it was sleeping or deceased, and Kevin’s message to Sarah read, “Do you want me to tell your daughter what really happened to her sister? I buried her this morning because you left her in the trash.” Upon obtaining a search warrant for the device, investigators found five photographs and a video depicting a dead infant.
In a statement to investigators, Sarah Helton claimed she gave birth at a midwife’s residence. Kevin Helton took the newborn to an adoption agency in Oklahoma City the day after the birth. Nonetheless, Sarah Helton was unable to provide the details of either the midwife or the adoption agency when questioned by police.
Kevin Helton told deputies that Sarah Helton immediately left home upon the child’s birth, preventing him from calling an ambulance as she believed there was an active warrant for her arrest.
Sarah Helton was previously convicted in Tulsa County for accessory to murder in 2017 and was released from prison in May 2022, less than five years following her incarceration.
The location of the newborn baby is still unknown. Although the baby “is presumed to possibly be deceased and disposed of,” the Garfield County and Noble County Sheriff’s office continue investigating the case. The Heltons are scheduled to appear before District Judge Blake A. Gibson on April 24 for a bond hearing.
The story of Sarah and Kevin Helton underscores the necessity of providing adequate assistance to expectant mothers in complex circumstances. Why Sarah Helton felt compelled not to seek medical attention, why Kevin Helton didn’t pursue assistance, and what factors they considered when making such decisions remain unanswered.
Regardless, the situation is a tragic reminder of the importance of embedding assistance and resources for pregnant women in difficult predicaments.
The Walt Disney Company faces an uneasy transition as they lay off thousands of employees this week while dealing with a tense dispute with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis.
The Burbank-based entertainment giant has announced a targeted $5.5 billion cost savings plan, marking “the biggest shake-up since” former CEO Bob Iger returned in November, who announced the plan for 7,000 job eliminations at the start of the year.
After completing this round, they will have eliminated 4,000 jobs of their 7,000 job elimination target.
Evidently, the job has been cut across various business segments, including Mike Soltys, ESPN VP/Corporate Communications and the network’s second-longest tenured employee. Though the job cuts represent around three percent of Disney’s global workforce, the scope of the layoffs is unclear, as the entertainment corporation employs about 100,000 workers in the US.
Notably, Disney relies on special legal privileges it held for decades at the Reedy Creek Improvement District, which covers 40 square miles of land owned by the company, to “speak out against the ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill” passed by DeSantis in March. This bill which bans classroom teaching on gender identity caused a deep and bitter argument between the two parties.
The job cuts are part of Iger’s plan to trim $3 billion from content and “the remaining $2.5 billion from non-content”. This new leadership in Disney has seen him appoint several creative executives – including Dana Walden and Alan Bergman – to bring authority back to the troubled corporation.
Disney is pushing to reach the target of job eliminations by the beginning of summer, and their efforts are clear. While difficult for those impacted, the company looks to turn around its problem for the better.