‘MARCH OF THE MILLION’: Massive crowds pack Jerusalem streets, demanding judicial reform

Fed up with the months of anti-government demonstrations where protesters, led by the opposition, claim to be fighting for democracy, at least 600,000 Israelis rallied in Jerusalem Thursday night, chanting “We demand judicial reform,” “We want a Jewish state,” and “64 mandates” – referring to the November 2022 election won by the Right.

A significant number of non-religious protesters held signs saying, “I am secular. I demand judicial reform.”

In first video below, the crowd is saying in Hebrew, “The nation demands judicial reform.”

The post ‘MARCH OF THE MILLION’: Massive crowds pack Jerusalem streets, demanding judicial reform appeared first on World Israel News.

‘Nazis are not welcome in Florida’: Gov. Ron DeSantis signs antisemitism bill

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signs bill cracking down on antisemitism into law during visit to Jerusalem.

By Andrew Bernard, The Algemeiner

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis on Thursday signed a bill described by one of its co-sponsors as “the strongest antisemitism bill in the United States.”

DeSantis signed the bill, HB 269, from Jerusalem’s Museum of Tolerance as part of an international trade mission that has included visits to Japan, South Korea and Israel, and that will conclude in the United Kingdom.

Described as a counter to “public nuisances,” the bill specifically prohibits certain forms of littering, harassment or intimidation based on religious heritage, the projection of images onto buildings without the owner’s permission, and the malicious disruption of a school or religious assembly.

Many of these “nuisances” are used as tactics by the so-called “Goyim Defense League” of neo-Nazis and other hate groups that have conducted campaigns of antisemitic leaflet littering, used projectors to superimpose antisemitic messages on buildings, and hung neo-Nazi banners on highway overpasses.

Speaking at press conference before the signing on Thursday, DeSantis emphasized the difference between protected speech under the First Amendment and the bigoted harassment that HB 269 is intended to counter.

“In the United States, you have a constitutionally protected right to say whatever you want, no matter how distasteful it is, no matter how hateful it is,” DeSantis said. “But you don’t have a right to threaten people, you don’t have a right to harass people, you don’t have a right to intimidate somebody, particularly on the basis of somebody’s religious affiliation.”

One of the co-sponsors of the bill, Rep. Randy Fine (R), told The Algemeiner in March that he was spurred to action by the outbreak of antisemitic activity in Florida.

“Nazis are not welcome in Florida,” he said. “The behavior they’re using to terrorize, intimidate, and assault Jewish Floridians is going to come to an end.”

Fine, who traveled to Israel for the signing, wrote on Twitter Thursday that HB 269 was “the strongest antisemitism bill in the United States.”

“To Florida’s Nazi thugs, I have news: attack Jews on their property and you’re going to prison,” he said.

Kenneth L. Marcus, the founder and chairman of the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, which provided constitutional and legal analysis to Florida’s Jewish community in support of the bill, welcomed the signing of the legislation on Thursday.

“We are now seeing a resurgence of right-wing hate crimes in the streets, just as we are seeing left-wing antisemitism growing on the campuses,” Marcus said. “All forms of antisemitism must be fought, through all available legal means, and we are pleased that this legislation will provide us with important additional tools to do so in Florida, as we continue to fight this scourge throughout the country.”

Antisemitic incidents in the United States increased 36 percent in 2022, according to an annual audit issued by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in March.

The ADL recorded 3,697 incidents — ten per day — across the US, the highest ever since the group began track them in 1979. Incidents of harassment, vandalism, and assault all spiked by double digits and occurred most frequently in New York, California, New Jersey, Florida, and Texas, which accounted for 54 percent of the ADL’s data. New York had the most, with 580 incidents. One incident resulted in a fatality.

 

The post ‘Nazis are not welcome in Florida’: Gov. Ron DeSantis signs antisemitism bill appeared first on World Israel News.

Fox News ratings tumble in Tucker Carlson slot after his firing

Ratings for Fox News’ flagship timeslot plummets 56% following removal of Tucker Carlson, with MSNBC topping Fox after trailing for years.

By The Associated Press

Hundreds of thousands of Fox News viewers are reacting to Tucker Carlson’s firing by abandoning the network in his old time slot — at least temporarily.

Fox drew 1.33 million viewers for substitute host Brian Kilmeade in the 8 p.m. Eastern hour on Wednesday night, putting the network second to MSNBC’s Chris Hayes in a competition Carlson used to dominate, the Nielsen company said.

That’s down 56% from the 3.05 million viewers Carlson reached last Wednesday, Nielsen said. For all of 2022, Carlson averaged 3.03 million viewers, second only to Fox’s “The Five” as the most popular program on cable television.

Carlson offered his own alternative to Kilmeade on Wednesday, posting a two-minute monologue on Twitter at 8 p.m. By Thursday afternoon, that video had been viewed 62.7 million times, according to Twitter.

Kilmeade had 1.7 million viewers on Tuesday and 2.59 million on Monday, when he told people who hadn’t already heard the news that Carlson would no longer be there.

Carlson had 2.65 million viewers on Friday for what he didn’t know at the time would be his last show on Fox. He was fired on Monday with no explanation given publicly, although there are no shortage of theories — including a former employee’s lawsuit that cited a toxic work atmosphere at his show, offensive statements by Carlson that came out as part of the Dominion Voting Systems lawsuit against Fox.

The ratings slump echoes what happened at Fox following the 2020 election, when many viewers angered by the network’s crucial election night declaration that Joe Biden had won Arizona followed then-President Donald Trump’s advice to seek alternatives. That caused tremendous angst behind the scenes at Fox, which was illustrated in documents released as part of the Dominion case.

Asked for comment, Fox responded with a statement noting that Fox has been cable news’ most-watched network for 21 years with its team “trusted more by viewers than any other news source.”

In the wake of Carlson’s firing, viewing at the conservative network Newsmax has shot up for Eric Bolling, who hosts a show in the same 8 p.m. Eastern slot.

For example, Bolling had 510,000 viewers Wednesday night, compared to 168,000 on Wednesday a week ago, Nielsen said. On Tuesday, Bolling had 562,000 viewers, up from 122,000 the same day a week earlier.

The challenge for Newsmax will be making it last. Fox surged again following Biden’s inauguration as president, and Newsmax couldn’t keep up the momentum.

The post Fox News ratings tumble in Tucker Carlson slot after his firing appeared first on World Israel News.

Veterans of Israel’s War of Independence say the Holocaust was not why they fought

3,000 years of Jewish history, not the Holocaust, inspired Israel’s soldiers to reclaim the Jewish historic homeland.

By TPS

Many see the creation of the modern-day State of Israel as part of a historical narrative, in which Israeli independence was a reaction to the Holocaust. “The catastrophe which recently befell the Jewish people—the massacre of millions of Jews in Europe—was another clear demonstration of the urgency of solving the problem of its homelessness by re-establishing in Eretz-Israel the Jewish State,” the provisional government of Israel declared on May 14, 1948.

But when the Tazpit Press Service interviewed nearly 30 veterans of the 1948 War of Independence in Israel from October 2022 to January 2023, all of the octogenarians, nonagenarians and centenarians said that 3,000 years of Jewish history — and not the Holocaust — drove them to help reclaim the Jewish historic homeland.

TPS found the interviewees by visiting nursing homes, kibbutzim and other sites in Israel and abroad, often asking to speak with the oldest people present. The roughly 30 who agreed to talk about their experiences spoke with TPS — the majority in English with some Yiddish — for more than 60 hours collectively.

The veterans spanned Israeli-born sabras who were active in the Jewish militias Irgun, Lehi and the Haganah, as well as foreign fighters who came to assist what would become the Israel Defense Forces in Machal units.

Both the native Israelis and the foreign volunteers knew a great deal about the Holocaust, and many had lost relatives and friends. They met survivors who recounted their experiences. But invariably, the veterans told TPS that they were motivated in their service by a long cultural and historical memory rather than World War II itself.

On Israel’s Independence Day, TPS shares a few of those stories.

The Haganah Messenger

TPS spent some eight hours at kibbutz Gan Shmuel with Itzik Mizrachi, 90, who shared his story, gave a tour of the kibbutz where he lives and invited TPS to lunch at its dining hall. The Jerusalem-born Mizrachi said he was a messenger in Haganah’s youth wing, Gadna.

During the outbreak of the war in May 1948, Itzik and his family were in the Mount Scopus area, and Arabs blocked them from taking roads to other safe areas. A mob mobilized to try to kill them, he said, but the patriarch of an Arab family, Abu Mustafa, who shared their home stood guard at the door and told the mob it would have to kill him first.

Soon thereafter, Haganah members came in an armored truck and told the family it had half an hour to gather its things and come to safety.

Mizrachi, who remains in good health, and walks and drives on his own, told TPS that he is the seventh generation in his family to live in Israel, after his ancestors, Sephardic Jews, left Spain during the expulsion.

As a Haganah message runner, he studied KAPAP—an acronym for krav panim el panim, or close-quarter fighting—which the Haganah used to disguise its weapons training. Mizrachi later studied with Imi Lichtenfeld, founder of krav maga martial art. Mizrachi’s son Rhon is now one of the recognized experts in that form of combat.

Mizrachi told TPS that the Holocaust was only one chapter in Jewish history. “Why would we allow that moment alone to define us as Jews?” he said. “Long before the Holocaust, we said, ‘Next year in Jerusalem’ every year during the Passover seder [meal].”

The Holocaust was a motivator, but not the main one. “For generations, we yearned for our independence. There were many pogroms, massacres and expulsions in our history. We never let any of these define us either,” he said.

South African Zionism

“The South African Jewish community was very Zionist long before the Holocaust,” Ruth Stern, 97, a South African nurse who now lives in Jerusalem, told TPS.

The 800 South African volunteers in 1948 paled in number only to Americans (1,000). Due to the representation from these two nations in particular, English became the most spoken language among the “machalniks.” Most foreign volunteers, who were likelier to know Yiddish than Hebrew, first spoke in Yiddish with Israelis.

Stern, who went to Israel to volunteer over her parents’ objections — “Why can’t you be like your sisters and not go?” — said that she and her peers knew about the Holocaust and that many South African Jews of Lithuanian heritage lost relatives back home.

“The Holocaust wasn’t why I volunteered or why most other Jews did,” she insisted.

In 1948, she treated many patients who had survived the Holocaust before their injuries in the war. They experienced trauma on top of trauma, she said.

She accounted for her choice to go to Israel despite pressure from her parents with her spirit of adventurousness. It’s not every 2,000 years that one can see the Jewish state rebuilt, she said, adding that she didn’t want to wait another two millennia.

High-Flying Graphic Designer

Asked whether the Holocaust motivated him, the late Alex Zilony, who died at age 107 on March 3, replied: “No. What a question!”

Zilony, who was born in Poland and grew up in Israel, studied in the United Kingdom before becoming a Haganah pilot. He was one of the founders of the Israeli Air Force, and speaking from his home in Tel Aviv, he told TPS that he designed the IAF emblem, which remains in use today.

“We have wanted a state for over 3,000 years,” he said. “Maybe the possibility of building a state was higher after the Holocaust because we got many new immigrants and war veterans, but Jews had been migrating since the 1920s and even before this,” he said.

Zilony’s daughter, Ruth, who was present during the interview, was as surprised as TPS was at her father’s response. “This was not the answer I expected,” she said, highlighting generational differences in Israel today.

Despite the tendency of American South African and British volunteer pilots to pride themselves on the proclamation that they helped solidify a victory in 1948, Zilony was adamant that Israel would have prevailed without that help.

Stay Alive!

“They say three Jews, five opinions,” the late Tom Tugend told TPS in a phone call from his California home late last year. “This time, it was half a million of us, one opinion—stay alive! Pretty much the whole Diaspora or every Jew who could hold a gun sent someone to represent their community.”

Despite having fled Nazi Germany to the United States and later returned to Europe as a U.S. soldier, Tugend insisted that his desire to help create a Jewish state was a more significant motivator than the Holocaust.

Jews came from a variety of backgrounds, noted Tugend, from Jewish IRA (Irish Republican Army) arms smugglers to Indian Jews. Some, like Tugend, had served in the U.S. military, or in the British or French armies in World War II. Some were officers, while others lacked any military experience, he said, and a few even came from Kenya.

“The South Africans were among the most dedicated fighters,” he pointed out. “There was a Jewish Texan cowboy with a Southern accent. There was a Jew with a Scottish accent, and I recall one from Yorkshire whom nobody could understand! They all wanted to defend the new nation of Israel.”

The post Veterans of Israel’s War of Independence say the Holocaust was not why they fought appeared first on World Israel News.

Senators Cruz, Cardin introduce bill for Golda Meir commemorative coin

Bipartisan bill marking Israel’s 75th Independence Day honors Prime Minister Golda Meir with minting of commemorative coin.

By Andrew Bernard, The Algemeiner

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Ben Cardin (D-MD) on Wednesday introduced bipartisan, bicameral legislation to celebrate the 75th anniversary of Israel’s founding by minting a commemorative coin of Golda Meir, Israel’s 4th Prime Minister.

“Golda Meir was a towering figure and left an incredible legacy,” Cruz said in a statement. “She signed Israel’s Declaration of Independence and was its first female prime minister. She did enormous work deepening the U.S.-Israel alliance, which is critical to the national security of both our countries and the safety and security of Americans. I am proud to join Senator Cardin in introducing this legislation to recognize her leadership on Israel’s 75th anniversary.”

Meir was born in Ukraine in 1898 but became a naturalized US citizen after she immigrated with her family to Milwaukee, Wisconsin in 1906. She made aliyah to Israel in 1921 and served as Israel’s first female prime minister from 1969 to 1974, leading the country through its response to the 1972 Munich massacre and the 1973 Yom Kippur War. Meir died in 1978.

“No recognition of Israel’s modern founding and rich 75-year history would be complete without particular mention of the outsized role of Prime Minister Golda Meir,” Senator Cardin said. “I am proud to be leading this legislation with Senator Cruz that will recognize her crucial role in building and strengthening the Jewish state and the enduring U.S.-Israel partnership.”

The bill, titled the “Prime Minister Golda Meir Commemorative Coin Act,” directs the Secretary of the Treasury to mint 50,000 $5 gold coins, 400,000 $1 silver coins, and 750,000 half-dollar coins with an image of Gold Meir. The final design selection will be made in consultation with the American Friends of Kiryat Sanz Laniado Hospital and the proceeds from the sale of the coins will benefit the hospital, located in the city of Netanya in southern Israel.

Additional co-sponsors of the bill include Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Mike Braun (R-IN) and Tim Kaine (D-VA), while the House version of the legislation was introduced by Representatives Andrew Garbarino (R-NY) and Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL).

The post Senators Cruz, Cardin introduce bill for Golda Meir commemorative coin appeared first on World Israel News.

Florida the only US state where El Al will service two cities

Israel’s national carrier recently relocated its American headquarters from N.Y. to the Sunshine State.

By JNS

In a reflection of growing ties, Florida will soon be the only U.S. state where El Al will service two major cities, Gov Ron DeSantis said Thursday.
Israel’s national carrier, which recently relocated its U.S. headquarters from New York to Margate, Florida, will offer direct service to Tel Aviv from both Miami and Fort Lauderdale starting this fall.

The two Florida airports are about 30 miles apart.

The move comes after American Airlines ended its nonstop service from Miami to Tel Aviv in March after nearly two years.

The governor attributed the growing demand for El Al’s services in the Sunshine State to the “historic migration” of American Jews and Israeli Americans there due to his business-friendly policies.

DeSantis, who is visiting Israel with a trade delegation, also announced that Avenger Flight Group of Fort Lauderdale will build a training center in Israel with El Al.

Earlier Thursday, the governor signed a bill to strengthen his state’s ability to combat antisemitism and vowed to reject all those who oppose Israel’s right to exist.

The Republican politician was keynoting a conference organized by The Jerusalem Post and the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Museum of Tolerance.

“When your focus is only on one Jewish state, and you hold it up to a different standard than any other country in the world, that is antisemitism,” said DeSantis.

“We are doing what we can do in Florida to enhance the ability to hold people accountable when that really crosses the line into threatening conduct. We are fighting back,” added the Republican, who is considering a 2024 U.S. presidential run.

“We must reject those who reject Israel’s right to exist,” he said.

The post Florida the only US state where El Al will service two cities appeared first on World Israel News.

18 Democrats, 1 Republican vote against House resolution honoring ties with Israel

House of Representatives votes 401 to 19 to back non-binding resolution honoring Israeli Independence Day and calling for expansion of Abraham Accords.

By Andrew Bernard, The Algemeiner

The House of Representatives on Tuesday evening passed a resolution honoring the 75th anniversary of Israel’s founding and the establishment of US-Israel relations by a vote of 401 to 19.

The bipartisan legislation had 22 co-sponsors including Representatives Ann Wagner (R-MO), Michael McCaul (R-TX), Kathy Manning (D-NC), and Brad Schneider (D-IL), and calls for deepening US-Israel ties, continued support for US military aid to Israel, and for the expansion of the Abraham Accords that established relations between Israel and several Arab countries in 2020.

Rep. Wagner, who introduced the resolution, said that she was proud of what the US and Israel have accomplished in those 75 years.

“My resolution honors the decades-long partnership between the United States and Israel that underpins security in the Middle East and promotes economic growth throughout the region,” she said in her floor speech. “The bipartisan passage of this resolution reaffirms our commitment to the people of Israel and promotes vital security assistance so they can defend themselves in the face of an increasingly aggressive Iran. We urge other nations to normalize relations with Israel and ensure existing agreements continue to provide necessary economic and national security for those in the area.”

Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ), who was also a co-sponsor and a participant in Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries’ (D-NY) congressional delegation to Israel this week, told The Algemeiner that the resolution would put additional pressure on other countries and the Palestinians to join the accords.

“The resolution talks about the importance of strengthening and expanding the accords,” he said. “A cornerstone of all of our conversations was how critically important the accords have been for regional security and regional economic development and how successful they’ve been, which is why it’s important that we continue the policy, and this administration has continued the last administration’s policy. I think those are all very positive developments for peace in the region. The Palestinian Authority has not been interested in joining the accords to date, I think this puts pressure on them. The more you expand, the more pressure on them to join and hopefully move towards more room for peace.”

While the resolution garnered overwhelming bipartisan support, a growing number of progressive Democrats are critical of the Jewish state.

That was reflected in the 19 nay votes that included every member of the so-called Squad of left-wing democrats except Greg Casar, as well as the chair of the progressive caucus Pramila Jayapal. The lone Republican nay vote was cast by Thomas Massie (R-KY), a libertarian who routinely votes against foreign policy measures.

The post 18 Democrats, 1 Republican vote against House resolution honoring ties with Israel appeared first on World Israel News.

Man Allegedly Impersonates Doctor Treating Thousands of Patients

In a shocking development, 44-year-old Stephan Gevorkian of Los Angeles County faces five felony counts of practicing medicine without a license.

According to prosecutors from the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office, Gevorkian has allegedly been providing treatments for thousands of individuals, some with “serious medical conditions such as cancer,” for several years without the permits or qualifications necessary for the practice of medicine.

The California Department of Consumer Affairs, the Division of Investigation, and the District Attorney’s Consumer Protection Division are jointly investigating the case. An undercover investigator posing as a patient visited Gevorkian’s North Hollywood business, Pathways Medical, on November 17, 2022, for a consultation.

Claiming that Pathways Medical was helping to ‘heal countless of our patients,’ the investigator soon realized something was amiss when Gevorkian failed to recognize visible hormone red flags in the blood work that could have signaled a possible significant illness.

Justin E. Sterling, Gevorkian’s defense attorney, has denied the allegations, going so far as posting a statement that proclaimed any insinuation of impersonating a doctor to treat unsuspected patients was “demonstrably false.”

Gevorkian was arraigned on Friday. He was released on his own recognizance on the condition that he does not engage in practicing medicine. However, in a case of this magnitude, the harm it could have inflicted on unsuspecting patients cannot be overstated, emphasizing the value and importance of ensuring that medical professionals are licensed and qualified to practice medicine.

Open Oceans or Shuttered Seas?

In 1609 the Dutch jurist Hugo Grotius penned Mare Liberum (Freedom of the Seas), where he argued that the oceans should be a civilizational commons where anyone can travel for purposes of peaceful commerce. His goal was to offer an alternative vision to the mare clausum (closed sea) promulgated by the Portuguese, who sought to monopolize Indian trade to the economic disadvantage of the Netherlands. The idea of the oceans being open and freely navigable would, like so much of Grotius’s thought, live on long beyond his age. 

The mare liberum would be enforced by the naval might of the British Empire in the 19th and early 20th centuries, driving an era of increasing global connection, mutual commerce, and prosperity. Merchant vessels from across the world could ply their trade in exotic ports and the laying of undersea cables made communication exponentially faster than ever before. Even so, the idea of free seas was not uncontested; nations and non-state actors fought against this regnant maritime ideology, trying to close territorial waters, impede commercial rivals, or simply hijack goods for profit. These challenges could only be deterred by force, usually supplied by a sovereign state.

This linkage between commercial trade and the need for a protective navy is where modern navalist philosophy, perhaps best espoused by the American historian Alfred Thayer Mahan, came into being. In his seminal 1890 work, The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, Mahan laid out this connection:

The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment… [sea power is] not only the military strength afloat, that rules the sea or any part of it by force of arms, but also the peaceful commerce and shipping from which alone a military fleet naturally and healthfully springs, and on which it securely rests,…

Mahan’s ideas were deeply influential and, combined with the Grotian doctrine of mare liberum, encouraged the use of navies to protect commerce and keep global trade flowing through the 20th century. 

However, the idea of using naval power to secure peaceful trade – even beyond one’s own vessels – has a flip side: using naval power to coerce or deter the peaceful trade of others. We are seeing both sides of this coin in the current competition between the United States and China.

The United States has relied on sea power since its inception owing to its heavy dependence on seaborne exports and imports. Our shared maritime heritage with the United Kingdom allowed for the peaceful transfer of naval predominance after World War II, with the US picking up where the British Empire left off. Since 1945, the American navy has ensured the idea of mare liberum, backed by institutions of international law. This norm of the free sea, defended by the American navy, has made the modern world what it is: globalized, interconnected, and rich. It has also greatly benefited the United States. Now, after nearly 80 years, a serious challenge has arisen: the Chinese Communist Party.

The Chinese government does not view mare liberum as the ideal, instead seeking to exert its own control over the seas. It sees the current system of free oceanic trade as biased towards American interests and wishes to shift that balance in its favor. One of the primary ways it seeks to change the status quo is through occupying of the world’s waters and assertion of special rights based on this adverse possession. China looks to leverage its blue water naval strength as much as possible, building a presence around the most critical parts of the global sea lines of communication (SLOC), maritime choke points.

The Middle Kingdom (中國) has been steadily increasing its presence at these crucial areas, both in the Indo-Pacific and much further abroad. Combined with China’s modernized version of mare clausum, its coercive diplomacy, and its policy of civil-military fusion, this has the potential to be a serious problem. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) uses its diplomatic heft aggressively, either cajoling nations into accepting its entreaties or roping them into predatory agreements. Its focus on dual-use infrastructure ensures that wherever Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) go, its military apparatus will follow. Using these positions, Xi Jinping’s nation could – in times of conflict – restrict passage through key seas and straits, raid commercial vessels, conduct technological espionage, use cyberattacks to cripple critical infrastructure, and force its enemies to play defense on a grand scale.

The Maoist state is putting its plan into action most assertively in its near-abroad. It has militarized the South China Sea, claiming it as its sovereign territory contra international law, creating artificial islands on which to base military assets, and asserting undersea rights over submarine cables – the arteries of the information age. Its quest to conquer Taiwan fits this paradigm, as the island sits astride the Taiwan Strait, a passage through which a significant portion of global commerce travels. It has invested heavily in dual-use port infrastructure in Malaysia and Indonesia, nations which lie next to the Strait of Malacca, the key seaway between the Pacific and Indian Oceans and a lifeline for both China and India. The East Asian nation has invested in major port infrastructure in Sri Lanka and used its debt-based leverage to force Chinese naval access to these ports not far from India. In Oceania, the Chinese People’s Republic has built security relationships with several nations in a quest to isolate Australia.

Further afield, China has invested in port infrastructure at Gwadar in Pakistan, turning it into a hub for Chinese commerce and militarism; conveniently, Gwadar lies just past the exit of the Persian Gulf, one of the world’s most trafficked seas. Just up that waterway, China has built relationships with Iran and Saudi Arabia – including brokering a recent rapprochement between the Islamic powers – ensuring access to potential dual-use infrastructure in the region. Its first overseas military base is in Djibouti, giving China the potential to project power through the Red Sea and the vital Suez Canal at its northern terminus. 

The CCP has also extended its activities into the Western Hemisphere, focusing on strategic waterways in Latin America. It is working to create a naval base at Ushuaia in Argentina, across from the Falkland Islands and just above the southern passage from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. It has also invested heavily in the Panama Canal zone, ringing that waterway with CCP-linked dual-use facilities. As a backup, it has promoted a rival passage through Nicaragua, one of its key allies in the region. Finally, China has asserted itself as an “Arctic nation,” seeking to gain a powerful maritime presence in this increasingly-important strategic realm.

This is not a minor challenge, but one which strikes at the heart of the world order and American sea power. China has already outbuilt us in terms of ships – both commercial and military – and seeks to put that primacy to use in its broader aim of displacing American hegemony. It is good that American strategists and our allies are coming to grips with the fact that this is a problem, but more must be done.

American shipyards need to be reinvigorated, producing more ships for commercial and military use; without the means by which to patrol the oceans and defend important SLOCs, policy will get nowhere. Freedom of navigation operations (FONOPs) need to be expanded in the Indo-Pacific and elsewhere to show that the world’s most populous country cannot unilaterally interdict open commerce or communications. This pace should ramp up, regardless of the hyperbolic Chinese reactions. America needs to go on offense diplomatically, working to undermine CCP influence near maritime choke points and offering a legitimate development alternative. Finally, the US must engage its allies in promoting the idea of the mare liberum for the 21st century and explaining to citizens and policymakers how critical the free sea is to global prosperity and security. Without buy-in from the public, it will be impossible to adequately counter the Chinese regime.

This century is seeing a return of the geopolitics of Great Powers, as well as the international issues that came with that dangerous, rivalrous world. The doctrines of mare liberum and mare clausum may date back to the 17th century, but are today relevant as ever. The battle between open oceans and shuttered seas is just beginning and China is surging ahead. The US and its partners should heed the lessons of the past and protect this crucial source of security and prosperity.

The post <strong>Open Oceans or Shuttered Seas?</strong> appeared first on Providence.