Bride Killed & Groom Seriously Hurt The Moment They Were Leaving Their Wedding

A South Carolina wedding celebration suddenly turned tragic Friday evening when an intoxicated driver collided with a golf cart carrying newlyweds away from the reception.

According to the groom’s mother, “they were struck from behind by a drunk driver traveling 65 MPH in a 25 MPH zone. The golf cart was thrown over 100 yards and rolled several times.”

In the fatal crash, the bride, 34-year-old Samantha “Sam” Hutchinson, lost her life, and the groom, Aric Hutchinson, was critically injured with a traumatic brain injury and multiple fractures. Additionally, two of the groom’s relatives, Ben and Brogan Garret, also suffered injuries from the crash.

25-year-old Jamie Lee Komoroski was arrested at the scene and has been formally charged with DUI causing death and reckless homicide. In light of the tragedy, a GoFundMe page has been established, and a campaign has been launched to help pay for the bride’s funeral expenses and the medical bills of the groom and his family.

The couple called Utah and South Carolina their homes, while the bride was originally from North Carolina. In a touching post on their company’s LinkedIn page, XenTegra, an international IT provider in North Carolina where Samantha worked, shared the heartbreaking news of her death.

The tragedy that Samantha and Aric Hutchinson experienced on their matrimonial night is an upsetting reminder of the risks involved with drunk driving. While their friends and family mourn for the bride and pray for the groom’s recovery and the health of his relatives, the donations from the GoFundMe account will assist in paying for funeral costs and medical fees.

The Economics and Politics of the World Social Forum

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article

The post The Economics and Politics of the World Social Forum appeared first on Global Research.

Bus Falls Off Cliff, Killing 18 People

At least 18 people lost their lives in a tragic accident in Nayarit, Mexico, on Saturday evening when a bus they were traveling in fell off a cliff between Tepic and Puerto Vallarta.

Aerial photographs from the Nayarit Security and Civil Protection Ministry show the catastrophic aftermath, with the mangled remains of the bus lying at the base of the 50ft drop.

As per reports, 11 women and seven men died in the accident, and 11 children were rescued and admitted to local hospitals.

Authorities are still conducting investigations and determining the cause of the tragedy.

Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador expressed his sadness. He conveyed his condolences to the families and friends of those who perished and wishes for the speedy recovery of those injured in the accident. He added, “We all have to be more aware of safety concerns in the face of so many tragic events.”

This is the latest of many tragic accidents in Mexico in recent times. Another bus accident in Puebla earlier in Feb left 17 dead.

Australia: Outsourced to the US Military Establishment

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article

The post Australia: Outsourced to the US Military Establishment appeared first on Global Research.

U.S. Interventionism in Sudan: Clashes between Two Military Forces

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article

The post U.S. Interventionism in Sudan: Clashes between Two Military Forces appeared first on Global Research.

Joe Biden’s New Communications Director Made Millions in Corporate Consulting

Before being tapped to become Joe Biden’s new communications director, political advisor Ben LaBolt made a pretty penny in corporate consulting — and many of his former clients have obvious interests in White House policy decisions today.

Joe Biden during a speech about creating new manufacturing jobs, in Washington, DC, April 25, 2023. (Jim Watson / AFP via Getty Images)

In February, President Joe Biden tapped well-connected political advisor Ben LaBolt to be his new communications director. Now, newly released financial disclosure documents show that LaBolt’s previous trip through Washington’s revolving door was incredibly lucrative, and many of his former clients have a stake in pressing matters before the administration, from gig labor and crypto regulations to railroad safety.

LaBolt worked as President Barack Obama’s deputy press secretary before turning to corporate consulting. The disclosures are a perfect illustration of how profitable this career path can be: LaBolt reported owning assets worth potentially more than $20 million last year.

And while LaBolt was reportedly barred from “participating in legal matters, investigations, or contracts” relating to some of his former tech and crypto industry clients when he joined the Biden administration, many of his other former clients have obvious interests in White House policy decisions today.

“President Biden has instituted the strongest ethics rules in history under the Biden-Harris Ethics Pledge,” White House assistant press secretary Robyn Patterson told the Lever. “Ben — like every official who serves in this White House — is proud to live up to that standard and comply with all appropriate recusals.”

LaBolt served as Obama’s 2008 campaign press secretary and White House deputy press secretary before working on Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign. In 2013, LaBolt cofounded a communications firm, the Incite Agency, with former Obama press secretary Robert Gibbs. Their firm was purchased in 2016 by the communications firm Bully Pulpit Interactive.

At the time, Gibbs and LaBolt’s clients reportedly included Google, Airbnb, Eli Lilly, and Bloomberg Philanthropies. The firm said its approach was “grounded in the strategies we’ve used to define the Obama brand and grow it into a national movement.” Until February, LaBolt was a partner and board director at Bully Pulpit Interactive.

In his financial disclosures, LaBolt reported a salary and bonus from Bully Pulpit Interactive of $833,000 last year, a $48,000 commission payment. He noted that he sold his stake in Bully Pulpit Interactive and received a $3 million equity payout.

One of LaBolt’s clients, Andreessen Horowitz, is a major investor in cryptocurrencies. He also worked for the crypto exchange Uniswap. The venture capital firm has been one of the most vocal lobbying spenders trying to shape crypto policy.

LaBolt’s client list last year included Facebook parent company Meta, as well as Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s family office, called West Street LLC, which represents his non-Facebook-related business interests.

The disclosure shows LaBolt worked for the gig economy delivery company Instacart, a company whose business model is based on classifying low-paid workers as independent contractors — a topic the Biden administration has suggested could be the subject of a future enforcement action by the Federal Trade Commission.

LaBolt represented Union Pacific, the second-largest railroad company in the United States. Like the rest of the railroad industry, the company has adopted a “precision scheduled railroading” strategy that’s meant slashing workforces and running larger trains to juice profits.

He additionally worked for Walton Enterprises, the primary family office of the Walton family, who owns Walmart. The Waltons are one of America’s richest families and made their fortune building a low-wage retail giant known for depressing workers’ wages and devastating local economies.

LaBolt’s firm, Bully Pulpit Interactive, previously worked for the Partnership for America’s Health Care Future, a coalition of health insurers, pharmaceutical companies, and hospital chains that spent $80 million opposing Medicare for All and any other major reforms to the health care system.

The group also opposed a “public option,” or government health insurance plan, an idea that Biden promised on the 2020 campaign trail and has not mentioned once since becoming president. According to a White House source, LaBolt did not work for the partnership.

You can subscribe to David Sirota’s investigative journalism project, the Lever, here.

Beau Is Afraid Is a Referendum on Director Ari Aster, Cinema’s Latest Wunderkind

Critics adore artsy auteur filmmaker Ari Aster, director of hits like Midsommar and Hereditary — they’re even willing to pretend his new surrealist comedy Beau Is Afraid is hilarious. It’s not.

Joaquin Phoenix in Beau Is Afraid. (A24)

How much you like Beau is Afraid might depend on your tolerance for representations of abjection. That is, watching Joaquin Phoenix as Beau breaking down psychologically over what appears to be the violent chaos of society, plus the death of his loathsome mother (Patti LuPone). Beau is almost always shown cowering, cringing, screaming, vomiting, enduring every kind of sad and screechy mortification, and fleeing from surreal dangers that might be real or all in his mind or in some ambiguous area between the two. There are perhaps twenty minutes total, sprinkled through the latter half of the film, when Beau expresses something else — rage, ecstasy, anything — but the rest of the three hours is Beau abased by his fears.

There’s an implied capitalist critique in the eventual revelation that Beau’s mother, Mona Wasserman, was a business tycoon who made her miserable lonely son the focal point of all the MW Corporation products generated and sold, with his photos at the center of the ad campaign. This critique seems tangentially reminiscent of Orson Welles’s take on his own film Citizen Kane as being a character study of a boy whose “parents were a bank.”

But whereas every phase of Charles Foster Kane’s development seems to add layers of complexity to his character, the portrayal of Beau Wasserman’s mass of neurotic fears never grows more complex or insightful. There’s an irony in the way MW products tend to emphasize safety, given that Beau never feels safe. But beyond that, Beau’s weeping and keening and running away become tiresome early on.

The film is supposed to be a comedy, according to director Ari Aster, just so you know. That’s a popular move being made lately. Insufferable dramas that test all your endurance to sit through are actually marvelous comedies — if only you’re highbrow enough to get the jokes. I’ve read that Tar is a hilarious “blast” for the cognoscenti, too. Paul Thomas Anderson said so.

Aster’s sense of trauma-comedy is realized in things like descriptions of Beau’s mother’s gruesome death caused by a chandelier dropping on her head, and her headless body being displayed in an open casket at her funeral in an otherwise traditional way, in a prim dress with hands peacefully folded on her chest. Beau’s father is represented as a gigantic penis locked in his mother’s attic, which one critic has called “Jabba the Nuts.” Beau falls down the ladder to get away from it, shrieking all the way. Yeah, hilarious stuff.

My own tolerance for this kind of thing is minimal. I was the only one in the screening room watching the latest Aster opus. Other people, ordinary filmgoers who don’t have to watch three-hour art films of epic repulsiveness know better than to blow their hard-earned leisure time on a silly monstrosity like Beau is Afraid.

Though the film is, apparently, doing solid business due to Aster’s “committed fan base.” There are a lot of obsessed Aster enthusiasts out there, it seems.

Martin Scorsese is one of them, which hurts me in a tender spot. Scorsese at his best is such an inspired filmmaker, a real natural, whereas Aster strains so hard for results nowhere near as good. I hate the way they’re practically doing public appearances together as a mutual admiration society.

It’s been distressing to discover that Aster, this much-admired new auteur, gets interviewed a lot about his influences, and reveals that he himself admires Scorsese, the Coen brothers, Stanley Kubrick, and Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger, all great directors I love. (Of course, Aster also loves Air Force One, so it’s not clear how seriously we have to take any of his favorites.)

Aster’s whole sensibility is foreign to mine. I watch his stuff unmoved, or worse — embarrassed, snorting, laughing in derision, and eventually numbed by scorn. Hereditary (2018) is one of the most ludicrous films I’ve ever seen in my life, and I’m a huge fan of horror films about hauntings. Midsommar (2019) is a better film, if only because the folk horror tradition saves him — all Aster has to do is not mess up a very effective and straightforward narrative formula involving the persistence of scary ancient cultures in apparently idyllic rural settings. Aster has a talent for production design, and in Midsommar, he creates a nicely flowery, sunny, yellow-and-white paradise of seemingly quaint rural Swedish society, which is actually an old-world cult practicing ritual sacrifice — but then again, we know that going in. So it works pretty well, though it’s way overlong and endlessly underscores the same limited experience of emotional trauma the way Aster always does.

Still from Beau Is Afraid. (A24)

He admits it. Aster interviewed on the Criterion Channel on his tendency to dwell on trauma in his films: “You take whatever is troubling you, and you, like, infect the audience with it. You kind of take your sickness and put it into them.”

Remarks like this lead to much speculation after you make a movie like Beau is Afraid. Though Aster isn’t telling, and we can assume his “full intentions are known only to him — and perhaps his mother and therapist.”

“I made something for an audience and I hope that it is exciting and fun and makes people feel things,” Aster said in a recent interview with the Associated Press. “I just cannot speak to what those things are, and shouldn’t.”

Gah! This fancy, frivolous love of sickness is such a preoccupation of the healthy. If you’ve always done fine in life, you can afford to wallow excitedly in the sick and the crazy and the abject. It’s the people who have never lived in any real state of hardship or chaos — weren’t raised in circumstances defined by mental illness, say, or alcoholism, or abuse, or mayhem of any kind — who want to make a film like Beau is Afraid. I hate these people. Trauma tourists, every one of them.

At least when the Coens do unraveling psychology from their own manifestly mentally healthy standpoint, they know to call it out, as in Barton Fink, when that creatively blocked chronicler of the suffering of the working man is denounced by an actually suffering working man, who says wearily, “You’re just a tourist with a typewriter.”

There are a lot of talented actors in Beau is Afraid lending the whole thing more dignity than it deserves. Besides Phoenix and LuPone there are Amy Ryan and Nathan Lane as Beau’s temporary caretakers, who are suspiciously like some kind of affluent sitcom parents full of strangely infinite solicitude — and you know that can’t end well. Stephen McKinley Henderson plays Beau’s therapist with his usual remarkable skill, and Parker Posey turns up late in the film to inject a little energy into the role of a grown-up version of Beau’s childhood love, Elaine.

But the adoring critics are making the film sound far livelier than it actually plays. Watching Beau Is Afraid feels more like having the filmmaker himself sitting next to you, endlessly nudging you to make note of the thirty-seven tiresome production design curlicues he’s inserted into every single scene.

Judging by reactions so far, this film is turning into a real referendum on filmmaker Ari Aster, driving cinephiles to declare themselves for or against. Which side are you on?

For Workers in the New Movie Unrest, the Clock Is the Villain

Before Pyotr Kropotkin became synonymous with the anarchist movement, the Russian aristocrat was a cartographer, working for the Russian Geographical Society. In 1872, influenced by the rising wave of revolutionary activity (in particular, the Paris Commune) he decided to put his studies aside and investigate the workers’ movement himself. He set out for a three-month […]

Chicago Never Forgot the Haymarket Martyrs

International Workers’ Day traces its roots to the 1886 Haymarket affair, when labor radicals in Chicago were unjustly executed. Ever since, reactionaries have tried to tarnish their legacy — and leftists have honored them as working-class martyrs.

Depiction of the Haymarket affair in Harper’s Weekly, May 15, 1886. (Wikimedia Commons)

On a visit to Chicago in 1988, Uruguayan journalist and historian Eduardo Galeano asked local friends to take him to Haymarket Square, the place forever associated with, as he put it, “the workers whom the whole world salutes every May 1st.” He was quickly disappointed by what he found. “No statue has been erected in memory of the martyrs of Chicago in the city of Chicago,” Galeano lamented a few years later. “Not a statue, not a monolith, not a bronze plaque. Nothing.”

In Uruguay, as around the globe, the Chicago anarchists executed in the 1880s while fighting for the eight-hour day have long been considered labor martyrs. But as Galeano’s fruitless search for a memorial demonstrates, in the United States — particularly in Chicago — the memory of the Haymarket martyrs has traditionally been suppressed, and the meaning of what happened to them has been contested for well over a century.

Reactionaries and those in power have typically presented the Haymarket affair as the quintessential story of “the thin blue line,” in which heroic police officers saved civilization from a lawless mob of terrorists. As recently as October 2020, in the wake of the George Floyd uprising, Chicago mayor Lori Lightfoot compared the current moment to the 1880s, when “people feared for their safety from groups of anarchists who routinely created chaos in the streets.”

But generations of Chicagoans — including many that voted out Lightfoot this year and elected progressive trade unionist Brandon Johnson — have rebuffed that narrative. They instead tell a story of exploited workers struggling for human dignity, having their lives deliberately destroyed, and yet meeting their fate with courage and thus inspiring a movement for working-class liberation.

While the epic of the Haymarket affair has rightly been told and retold countless times, the story of this battle over historical memory — and how it specifically played out in Chicago — remains relatively unknown.

The Martyrs

On May 1, 1886, hundreds of thousands of US workers went on strike and marched to demand the eight-hour workday — a day of action called by the Federation of Organized Trades and Labor Unions, the precursor to the American Federation of Labor. Thanks to radical labor organizers like Albert Parsons and August Spies, Chicago saw the biggest demonstrations of the day, which remained peaceful.

But two days later, police shot several striking workers at the city’s large McCormick Reaper Works as they scuffled with scabs. Witnessing this firsthand, a horrified Spies called for a rally to “denounce the latest atrocious act of the police.”

The next night, May 4, around 2,500 workers — most of them immigrants — gathered at Haymarket Square to listen to local anarchists deliver speeches from atop a wagon. Mayor Carter Harrison was in attendance and judged the gathering to be “tame.” As the rally wound down and the crowd dwindled to two hundred people, Harrison headed home, but not before telling the 175 police officers stationed a couple blocks away to stand down.

The business press immediately labeled the incident ‘the Haymarket Riot’ and demanded blood.

Ignoring the mayor’s instructions, the police marched toward the protesters and ordered them to disperse as the last speaker was wrapping up. That’s when a still-unknown assailant threw a homemade bomb into the phalanx of cops, which immediately exploded. Frantic, officers began shooting wildly, and some of the rally-goers allegedly shot back. In the end, seven police officers and at least three workers died. Officer Mathias Degan was killed by the eruption, but historians generally believe the other cops died after being hit by friendly fire from fellow officers.

The business press immediately labeled the incident “the Haymarket Riot” and demanded blood. Martial law was declared in the city. Chicago police ransacked union halls, radical newspapers, and private homes, arresting hundreds of anarchists, socialists, and labor activists without due process.

That summer, eight of the city’s most outspoken anarchists — Parsons, Spies, Adolph Fischer, George Engel, Louis Lingg, Samuel Fielden, Michael Schwab, and Oscar Neebe — were put on trial for the murder of the seven police officers. With no physical evidence directly tying the men to the bomb, they were instead tried for their revolutionary beliefs and found guilty.

Portraits of the Haymarket martyrs, 1887. (Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper via Wikimedia Commons)

The judge sentenced Neebe to fifteen years in prison, but the other seven were condemned to execution. Over the next year, Lucy Parsons, Albert’s wife and fellow anarchist, led an international campaign demanding clemency for the men, whom sympathizers began calling the Haymarket martyrs. Radicals, liberals, and trade unionists worldwide rushed to support the cause, viewing the trial as a sham and an attempt to crush the labor movement.

The Illinois governor commuted the sentences of two of the condemned men — Fielden and Schwab — to life in prison, but did nothing to spare the lives of the others. On the eve of the scheduled executions, Lingg died of an apparent suicide in his jail cell. Parsons, Spies, Fischer, and Engel were hanged together on November 11, 1887. They were buried in Waldheim Cemetery in the western suburb of Forest Park — no graveyard in the city was willing to accept their remains.

On May 1, 1890, invoking the memory of the Haymarket martyrs, workers in multiple countries staged strikes and demonstrations demanding the eight-hour day. From then on, May 1, or May Day, was International Workers’ Day.

But in Chicago, a struggle over the meaning and memory of the Haymarket affair exploded almost immediately — and has continued for over a century.

Two Monuments

In September 1887, six weeks before the execution of the convicted anarchists, a group of prominent Chicago-area businessmen launched a fundraising drive to build a monument honoring the police officers killed and wounded at the Haymarket affair. With the Chicago Tribune hyping the campaign, the group quickly raised $10,000 to erect a nine-foot-tall bronze statue of a cop with his arm outstretched and palm facing forward. An inscription on the pedestal read: “In the name of the People of Illinois, I command peace.”

The police monument, which was placed in Haymarket Square, sparked protest even before its official unveiling in May 1889. On May 3, 1889, a leaflet was placed on the new monument’s pedestal asking, “Have you ever given a thought to . . .the base murder of five of the real victims of the haymarket tragedy…?” The anonymously authored pamphlet continued: “The time will come for an ample justification of our comrades, but it is not quite yet. On the monument at the haymarket should be inscribed in letters of fire these words: ‘Erected to commemorate the strangling of free speech and the shame of an enslaved people!’”

The trial of the anarchists in Chicago related to the Haymarket bombing. (Louis Gasselin / The New York Public Library Digital Gallery, Mid-Manhattan Picture Collection via Wikimedia Commons)

Authorities shrugged off this “blatant anarchist screed,” as the Tribune called it, and moved forward with the police monument’s dedication ceremony on May 30, Memorial Day. Meanwhile, the widowed Lucy Parsons and her comrades established the Pioneer Aid and Support Association to solicit donations for the families of the Haymarket martyrs. The association also raised money for a monument at the site of the martyrs’ tomb — a response to the police statue in Haymarket Square.

After nearly six years, enough money had been collected for sculptor Albert Weinert to build the Haymarket Martyrs’ Monument: a statue of a hooded woman, representing Justice, protecting a fallen worker and placing a laurel wreath on his head. August Spies’s final words from the gallows are inscribed on the monument: “The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the voices you are throttling today.”

Photo of Lucy Parsons taken in 1886. (Louis Gogler / Wikimedia Commons)

On June 25, 1893, at a ceremony attended by eight thousand people, the monument was unveiled at the grave of the executed anarchists in Waldheim Cemetery. The following day, Illinois governor John Peter Altgeld — a prolabor Democrat elected the previous November — pardoned the Haymarket anarchists, freeing Fielden, Schwab, and Neebe while excoriating the trial and executions as a gross miscarriage of justice.

Altgeld’s pardon, along with his refusal to support the deployment of federal troops to crush the Pullman strike the following year, effectively ended his political career. He lost his reelection bid and never held public office again.

Remembering

In the decades following the Haymarket affair, as trade unionists and radicals around the world cemented the tradition of marking May 1 as International Workers’ Day, the Haymarket Martyrs’ Monument became a place of pilgrimage for leftists and labor activists.

Eugene Debs, who had led the 1894 Pullman strike and would later become the standard-bearer of the Socialist Party, paid a visit to Waldheim Cemetery in the late 1890s and penned an essay celebrating the Haymarket anarchists. Describing them as “the first martyrs in the cause of industrial freedom,” Debs wrote that he looked forward to the day “when the parks of Chicago shall be adorned with their statues.”

The Haymarket police memorial. (Adolph Witteman / Chicago Historical Society via Wikimedia Commons)

Around the same time, famed anarchist Emma Goldman also came to Chicago and paid her respects at the monument, which she called “the embodiment of the ideals for which the men had died.” At her request, Goldman was herself buried at Waldheim in a grave plot near the Haymarket anarchists after her death in 1940.

As for the police monument at Haymarket Square, after nearby property owners complained that it took up too much space, it was moved about a mile west to the intersection of Randolph Street and Ogden Avenue in 1900. Every year on May 4, the Veterans of the Haymarket Riot — an organization of surviving police officers from the night of the bomb — would gather for a memorial service in front of the statue and rededicate themselves to preserving “law and order.”

On May 4, 1927, a streetcar making the turn from Randolph to Ogden jumped the tracks and crashed into the monument’s pedestal, toppling the statue. The motorman claimed it was an accident caused by unresponsive air brakes, but legend has it he was later overheard saying he “was sick of seeing that policeman with his arm raised.” It is indeed a curious coincidence that the collision happened on the anniversary of the Haymarket incident. To avoid similar traffic accidents, the police statue was moved the following year to nearby Union Park, where it would remain mostly out of sight for the next three decades.

Describing them as ‘the first martyrs in the cause of industrial freedom,’ Debs wrote that he looked forward to the day ‘when the parks of Chicago shall be adorned with their statues.’

During the great labor upsurge of the 1930s, a new generation of working-class radicals — particularly the youthful Communist organizers of the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) — embraced the legacy of the Haymarket martyrs. In early 1938, the CIO-affiliated, Communist-led Farm Equipment Workers Union (FE) successfully unionized International Harvester’s Tractor Works — the McCormick family–owned plant where August Spies witnessed police brutalizing strikers in 1886, prompting the fateful Haymarket rally.

In February 1941, around one thousand FE members rallying outside the tractor plant were addressed by none other than Lucy Parsons, who was now in her eighties and losing her eyesight. It would be one of Parsons’s last public appearances, as she tragically died in a house fire the following year. Her ashes were buried in Waldheim close to the grave of Albert and his comrades — a fitting resting place given that Lucy, more than any other individual, had kept the revolutionary spirit of the Haymarket martyrs alive through her more than fifty-year career as an agitator and organizer.

“Declaration of War”

As McCarthyite hysteria smothered the country, May Day went virtually unrecognized in Chicago and the broader United States for many years. The police monument was even refurbished and moved back to Haymarket Square in May 1958. The martyrs’ monument in Waldheim Cemetery was maintained only thanks to the efforts of Irving Abrams, a longtime Wobbly and the last member of the Pioneer Aid and Support Association.

In the late 1960s, Chicago was rocked by unrest reminiscent of the Haymarket affair, as the forces of “law and order” sought to quell social movements and silence radical agitators. Following Martin Luther King Jr’s assassination in 1968, young black residents rebelled against racial injustice, and Mayor Richard J. Daley infamously ordered police to “shoot to kill” suspected rioters. That summer, thousands of anti–Vietnam War activists converged in Chicago for the Democratic National Convention, only to be met with a bloody police crackdown that culminated in a conspiracy trial against protest leaders.

Postcard depicting Haymarket Square, Chicago, circa 1905. (Moore & Evans Chicago / Wikimedia Commons)

A local group of unionists — CIO veterans Leslie Orear, Bill Garvey, and Mollie Lieber West, along with University of Illinois Chicago labor historian Bill Adelman — believed it was a critical moment to resurrect the history and lessons of the Haymarket affair. On May 4, 1969, they organized a wreath-laying ceremony at Haymarket Square, emceed by renowned Chicago broadcaster and oral historian Studs Terkel. Connecting history with the present moment, they emphasized how the 1886 rally had been a protest against police brutality. The committee then incorporated as the Illinois Labor History Society (ILHS) and began pushing for a new, pro-worker memorial in Haymarket Square.

Five months later, on the night of October 6, the Haymarket police statue was blown to pieces when explosives were placed between its legs. The Weatherman faction of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) took responsibility, blowing up the statue to inaugurate their weeklong “Days of Rage” demonstrations.

The Haymarket Martyrs’ Monument. (Zol87 / Wikimedia Commons)

The leader of the Chicago Police Sergeants’ Association described the statue bombing as “a declaration of war between the police and the SDS and other anarchist groups,” and declared it was now a “kill or be killed” situation for cops. Only two months later, Chicago police, alongside the FBI, brutally murdered Illinois Black Panther Party chairman Fred Hampton and fellow Panther Mark Clark.

The cop statue was quickly rebuilt, but the Weathermen destroyed it a second time on October 5, 1970. After the statue was put up again, an exasperated Mayor Daley ordered round-the-clock police protection of the monument, costing the public an estimated $67,440 per year.

Orear, president of the recently formed ILHS, wrote to Daley recommending the city move the police monument to a different location. Swayed by the fiscal logic of the argument, the city relocated the statue in early 1972 from Haymarket Square for the last time. It was initially placed in the lobby of police headquarters for four years, then spent three decades in the courtyard of the police academy — where would-be vandals could not get to it.

Preservation

For years, Chicago officials rejected the ILHS’s appeal for a new monument or park in Haymarket Square. “It’s all a part of a deliberate amnesia,” Orear complained. “Our story is that Haymarket was a police riot — nobody did a damn thing till the police came. Their story is that [the incident] saved the city from anarchist terrorism.”

The Haymarket Memorial in Chicago. (Stephen Hogan / Wikimedia Commons)

In May 1986, a coalition of artists, activists, unionists, teachers, historians, clergy, and other community members came together to commemorate the centennial of the Haymarket affair. Scores of public events were held around Chicago, including marches, rallies, art exhibits, poetry recitals, a dramatization of the Haymarket trial performed by members of Actors’ Equity, and musical performances by Pete Seeger, among others. Mayor Harold Washington gave his stamp of approval to the festivities by declaring May 1986 “Labor History Month.”

Finally, by the early 2000s, the city agreed to erect a new monument in Haymarket Square.

Made by artist Mary Brōgger, the Haymarket Memorial was dedicated in September 2004 — over 118 years after the bomb was thrown. Located at the exact spot where the speakers’ wagon stood on the night of May 4, 1886, the memorial is a rust-colored sculpture depicting a wagon with human shapes speaking atop it.

‘Over the years,’ a carefully worded plaque on the memorial’s base reads, ‘the site of the Haymarket bombing has become a powerful symbol for a diverse cross-section of people, ideals and movements.’

At the dedication ceremony, the presidents of both the Chicago Federation of Labor and Fraternal Order of Police gave speeches — and each was heckled by different crowd members with competing interpretations of the Haymarket affair. “Over the years,” a carefully worded plaque on the memorial’s base reads, “the site of the Haymarket bombing has become a powerful symbol for a diverse cross-section of people, ideals and movements.”

Despite the memorial’s intended ambiguity, it has been claimed by the labor movement and frequently serves as a rallying point for marches organized by leftist protesters of various stripes.

Not to be outdone, in June 2007, the Haymarket police statue was again refurbished, given a new pedestal, and moved to Chicago Police Headquarters on South Michigan Avenue. The rededication ceremony featured the great-granddaughter of Mathias Degan, the one officer historians agree was killed by the bomb.

Rebirth

In recent decades, Chicago’s growing working-class Latino community has embraced the Haymarket story, which is perhaps not surprising given the almost saintlike status of the Haymarket martyrs in Latin America’s labor movements.

On May Day 2006, up to four hundred thousand Latino workers marched in Chicago as part of the historic “Day Without Immigrants” demonstrations, some of them stopping to pay homage at the new memorial in Haymarket Square. A few weeks later, Eduardo Galeano returned to the Windy City during a book tour and discussed the significance of the Haymarket affair with some of the local unionists who had led the march.

Latino Chicagoans especially celebrate Lucy Parsons, who claimed Mexican ancestry. In 2017, a portion of Kedzie Avenue in the Logan Square neighborhood, near where Parsons resided for several years, was honorarily named “Lucy Gonzales Parsons Way” with support from socialist alderman Carlos Ramirez-Rosa. Fellow socialist Anthony Quezada, a newly elected Cook County commissioner, successfully introduced a resolution last month formally recognizing May 1 as International Workers’ Day and commemorating the lives of the Haymarket martyrs. And last year, young Latino artists with Yollocalli Arts Reach — the youth initiative of Chicago’s National Museum of Mexican Art — painted a new mural of the Haymarket martyrs on the exterior of Grace Elementary School in the city’s Little Village neighborhood. The mural is titled “Que La Libertad Nos Bese En Los Labios Siempre” (“May Freedom Kiss Us on the Lips Forever”).

“You have to swim in whatever pool there is and rebuild and rebuild,” said the ILHS’s Orear, who died in 2014 at the age of 103. “This is the story of American labor — defeat, starvation and rebirth.”

HISTORIC: McCarthy announces establishment of House-Knesset Parliamentary Friendship Group

“After 75 years of friendship between the United States and Israel, I know this to be true: the best days for Israel—and our unbreakable bond—are ahead of us,” US House Speaker Kevin McCarthy told the Knesset in his historic address on Monday.

“I want Congress and the Knesset to work together as closely as possible. That’s why I’ll establish a House-Knesset Parliamentary Friendship Group – so we can continue to strengthen our bonds, build mutual understanding as elected representatives, and work better together.”

I want Congress and the Knesset to work together as closely as possible.

That’s why I’ll establish a House-Knesset Parliamentary Friendship Group – so we can continue to strengthen our bonds, build mutual understanding as elected representatives, and work better together. pic.twitter.com/KdEFtsvd7V

— Kevin McCarthy (@SpeakerMcCarthy) May 1, 2023

The post HISTORIC: McCarthy announces establishment of House-Knesset Parliamentary Friendship Group appeared first on World Israel News.