IDF eliminates terrorists who murdered Lucy Dee and her daughters

Three Arab terrorists who murdered a UK-Israeli woman and her two daughters are eliminated during gun battle with Israeli soldiers in Samaria.

By World Israel News Staff

Israeli security forces eliminated three terrorists and wounded four others during a gun battle in the Palestinian Authority city of Shechem (Nablus) in Samaria Thursday morning.

IDF soldiers and Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) forces entered the Old City of Shechem (Nablus) as part of a counter-terror operation.

The Israeli forces came under fire, sparking a gun battle with a group of terrorists.

According to a report by The Jerusalem Post, during the gun battle, an Israeli suicide drone was launched towards the building where the terrorists where holed up.

The drone reportedly entered through a window and detonated, killing three of the terrorists and wounding four more.

The terrorists killed Thursday morning have been linked to the murder of three dual UK-Israeli citizens in a drive-by shooting attack in the Jordan Valley last month.

Lucy Dee and her daughters Maia and Rina, residents of Efrat in Gush Etzion, were killed in the attack.

The Mayor of Efrat, Oded Revivi, lauded the IDF for the elimination of the terrorists responsible for the murder of Lucy, Maia, and Rina Dee.

“On behalf of the residents of Efrat, I thank the soldiers and commanders for their unceasing efforts on our behalf.”

“Together we will continue to embrace the members of the Dee family, gaining strength as a community and strengthening the town. Our strong approach alongside the elimination of terrorists is the best answer to terrorism.”

The post IDF eliminates terrorists who murdered Lucy Dee and her daughters appeared first on World Israel News.

Teen Dies After Freak Accident in Gym Class

The death of 16-year-old Brayden Bahme, affectionately known as “Fish Pockets,” has left the Cheney High School community in shock and mourning.

On April 27, the Cheney native tragically passed away after being fatally impaled through his eye during gym class in Washington State. Fire Chief Tom Jenkins reported the injury was not sustainable with life.

The tragedy quickly prompted an outpouring of remembrance and support from the community. To honor Bahme, a candlelight vigil was held at the school on Monday evening.

Many attendees donated fishing gear in tribute to the avid angler, and a GoFundMe page was established to cover funeral expenses. The fundraiser has since raised over $20,000, and the remaining funds will be used to create a youth fishing program in Bahme’s name.

A classmate and soccer teammate said in a Facebook Post Brayden was “one of the most nicest and most respectful students” they had ever met. Representative of his uplifting spirit, some of his friends remembered Brayden as “the life of the room” at school events.

The death of Brayden Bahme is a heartfelt reminder of life’s unpredictable, finite nature. His legacy will live on through donations to his GoFundMe page, the fishing gear given in his honor, and the youth fishing program bearing his name. Brayden Bahme will be remembered for his tremendous kindness, respect, and enthusiasm for the sport of fishing.

What Does America Owe its Citizens Abroad?

A brutal civil war is unfolding in Sudan, with opposing military factions engaging in all-out warfare across the nation. The clash between the Sudanese army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has its roots in the downfall of the Sudanese dictator Omar al-Bashir in 2019, when the two forces colluded to support a popular uprising. Now these groups are fighting for supremacy, catching the country in the crossfire. Also entangled in that fracas are Western civilians and the disparate handling of their plights is telling.

Since the crisis exploded, this threat has been ramping up. Tragic stories of woe from Khartoum and its environs have been filtering out. Many civilians from Europe and the U.S. are attempting to flee the chaos; their nationality seems to be playing a role in their success in that endeavor. European nations have successfully evacuated their citizens by air, while the United States has essentially said to its citizens that they should make their own plans and should not expect the help of the American government. This is in spite of the fact that we were able to exfiltrate our embassy personnel without incident. At least 16,000 Americans remain in Sudan, many of whom are struggling to escape a rapidly deteriorating situation. Two Americans have already died during this chaos.

The blasé attitude of the Biden administration in this situation has been galling, especially in light of the swift European response. White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre stated that “It is not our standard procedure to evacuate American citizens living abroad.” The State Department echoed these remarks, saying that it had reached out to Americans in Sudan with recommendations on “security measures and other precautions they can take on their own.” It also seemed to cast blame on those trapped in Sudan, claiming that the U.S. had warned them in advance. This disinterest in the well-being of Americans abroad is deeply distasteful, but not new.

The Biden administration rolled out this same playbook after its calamitous withdrawal from Afghanistan. Despite initially claiming that only 100 Americans were left in the country after our evacuation, the administration eventually admitted that it had understated this amount significantly. We also left behind nearly 80,000 Afghan allies, abandoning them to hostile Taliban forces. In early April, the Pentagon released a report on the withdrawal, laying the blame entirely on others and claiming that the Saigon-like scenes in Kabul were evidence of a successful airlift. These two events – Sudan and Afghanistan – show a worrying trend in American foreign policy under the Biden administration: a deliberate choice to leave American citizens in the lurch during foreign chaos. This is unbecoming of a hegemonic power, something history demonstrates.

Generally, the citizens of a world-spanning power tend to be protected from abuse abroad by the fact of their citizenship. This dates back to Roman times, when the concept of civis Romanus sum appeared. That statement, which translates as “I am a Roman citizen,” was shorthand for the deterrent effect that claims of Roman citizenship had on violent actors. Everyone knew that ill-treatment of a Roman citizen could bring the world down around them. This is discussed in the Bible in Acts, when Paul is harassed by local authorities:

The chief captain commanded him to be brought into the castle, and bade that he should be examined by scourging; that he might know wherefore they cried so against him. And as they bound him with thongs, Paul said unto the centurion that stood by, Is it lawful for you to scourge a man that is a Roman, and uncondemned? When the centurion heard that, he went and told the chief captain, saying, Take heed what thou doest: for this man is a Roman. … Then straightway they departed from him which should have examined him: and the chief captain also was afraid, after he knew that he was a Roman, and because he had bound him.

Acts 22: 24-29

The fact of Roman citizenship forced Paul’s persecutors to desist; the certainty that the Empire would defend its own made an impact.

About 1800 years later, civis Romanus sum was revivified by a new world hegemon: the British Empire. One of the 19th century’s eminent statesmen, Lord Palmerston, brought the concept back in June 1850 when he addressed Parliament over the Don Pacifico affair. This situation involved British citizens being ill-treated by the Greek government after their property was destroyed. Palmerston saw this as an affront to British honor and the liberal cause of rule of law and sent gunboats to Greece to force a just resolution. In a speech to the Commons, Palmerston evoked civis Romanus sum:

I therefore fearlessly challenge the verdict which this House, as representing a political, a commercial, a constitutional country, is to give on the question now brought before it; whether the principles on which the foreign policy of Her Majesty’s Government has been conducted, and the sense of duty which has led us to think ourselves bound to afford protection to our fellow subjects abroad, are proper and fitting guides for those who are charged with the Government of England; and whether, as the Roman, in days of old, held himself free from indignity, when he could say civis Romanus sum; so also a British subject, in whatever land he may be, shall feel confident that the watchful eye and the strong arm of England, will protect him against injustice and wrong.

The Lords strongly dissented from Palmerston’s approach, but the public was enraptured, seeing him standing up for British rights against arbitrary foreign despotism. An article from the Weekly Chronicle of London details this positive response:

Palmerston is the most popular man in England. The crowds that have lined the approaches to the House of Commons to cheer him every evening, and the unanimous support of the Provincial Press shew it. His own defence of his policy has placed him at the head of our Parliamentary orators and established him as the first of our statesmen. The people of England are with him. They will support the Foreign Minister who enables “a British subject to consider himself in foreign countries as protected by the vigilant eye and strong arm of his government against injustice and wrong”; and the Minister who makes their sympathy with constitutional liberty patent to the world.

That assertive approach to defending the rights of British citizens would continue through the Victorian age and was mimicked by other powers, including the United States.

In 1904 America was a rising imperial power, with citizens and commercial interests spread across the globe. When Ion Perdicaris, an American businessman in Morocco, was kidnapped by the warlord Ahmed al-Raisuli, it stoked a major foreign policy crisis. Raisuli demanded major concessions from the Moroccan sultan, threatening to kill Perdicaris if his conditions were not met. President Theodore Roosevelt and his Secretary of State John Hay were outraged and, seeing this as an opportunity to show American resolve before the 1904 election, dispatched a flotilla of warships to the Moroccan coast. The threat of the ships’ guns and the Marines onboard forced the sultan into negotiations. After a break in the talks, Hay sent a famously curt ultimatum to the sultan: “Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead.” This forceful warning did the trick, and Raisuli’s conditions were met. Perdicaris was released and Roosevelt had his foreign coup. This bold action showed America’s resolve on the world stage and bolstered its reputation abroad.

The United States is far more dominant in 2023 than it was in 1904 – and it is at least as powerful as the British and Romans were in their heyday. So why have our leaders taken such a passive approach to endangered Americans overseas? This attitude implies that our government does not care about the fate of ordinary Americans when they are stuck in difficult situations abroad. When the administration takes care of its own by evacuating embassy personnel and refuses to do the same for regular citizens, this looks craven. Abandoning Americans to cope with foreign threats on their own will only result in more of those threats; deterrence breaks down when the State displays such ambivalence.

We need a new motto for times such as these: civis Americanus sum. This would entail a reassertion of American values like the rule of law, antipathy toward arbitrary government, and refusal to abandon our own. Not only do we have the ability to uphold these values, we have the obligation to do so. That does not mean a return to gunboat diplomacy – although it would provide a use for those currently-useless littoral combat ships. What it does mean is a determined commitment to defending the rights of Americans abroad when they are threatened or treated unfairly. Americans should not be seen as easy targets and should be able to travel with the knowledge that their nation has their back if danger arises. If American citizenship guarantees anything, it should be this.

The post What Does America Owe its Citizens Abroad? appeared first on Providence.

Suspect Arrested in Fatal Shooting at Atlanta Hospital

We are painfully reminded of the horrifying gun violence epidemic that continues to plague the United States after a shooting at a medical building in Atlanta, Georgia, on Wednesday, May 3. Ex-U.S. Coast Guardsman Deion Patterson, aged 24, has been arrested by police in connection with the crime.

On Wednesday morning, the incident left Amy St. Pierre, 39, dead and four other women ages 25-71, three critically and seriously wounded. The motive and whether Patterson knew or had targeted any of the victims remains to be seen. After the shooting, Patterson left the scene on foot and carjacked a pickup truck from a nearby gas station. Reportedly, an undercover police officer was able to identify him north of the city, which eventually led police to the culprit, which is currently being investigated.

Patterson was a member of the U.S. Coast Guard from July 2018 to January of this year. But no word has been made regarding why he was discharged from the U.S. Coast Guard. Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens released a statement on the incident. He referred to it as the latest addition to a “national epidemic of gun violence” that affects not only public places like parks and schools but also sacred spaces such as churches and hospitals. Unfortunately, this horrendous event has become all too common in our society.

Selected Articles: The Kremlin Under Drone Attack, Failed Attempt to Assassinate President Putin?

The Kremlin Under Drone Attack, Failed Attempt to Assassinate President Putin?

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, May 03, 2023

The drone attack directed against the Kremlin (allegedly) with a view to killing President Putin is no trivial matter. The Kremlin

The post Selected Articles: The Kremlin Under Drone Attack, Failed Attempt to Assassinate President Putin? appeared first on Global Research.

TV Writers Say They’re Striking to Stop the Destruction of Their Profession

Television shows across the country are going dark because their writers have walked off the job. The strikers say they had no choice but to walk, as new technology and the squeeze from executives have put their very livelihood in serious danger.

Writers walk the picket line on the second day of the television and movie writers’ strike outside of Paramount Studios in Los Angeles, California, on May 3, 2023. (Frederic J. Brown / AFP via Getty Images)

When Sharyn Rothstein was hired onto her first television writing job, she had two young children. She needed stability, and the USA Network’s show Suits offered her that.

“I got to work for most of the year: I knew what my income was going to be and I knew what my job was going to be,” she told me. But in the eight years since that first job, the industry has changed.

“The amount of time we have to write a show has shrunk, and the amount of writers who they will hire to write that show has shrunk. So writers end up only working six, ten, or maybe twelve weeks in a year. You can’t piece together a sustainable living doing that.”

Rothstein explained the changes to me yesterday as we stood at the corner of Fifth Ave and Thirty-Seventh Street in Manhattan, a few feet away from the Writers Guild of America (WGA) East’s picket line. The location of the New York picket is illustrative of the issue. They were picketing Peacock NewFront — a name that is compelling evidence of the lackluster results you get when executives try to put words together. As I overheard one picketer say to another, “What even is this place?” Hundreds of writers clogged a full city block, chanting and holding signs. Given their line of work, those signs had a variety of messages — from “Fair contract now!” to “Pay your writers or we’ll spoil Succession.

The changes Rothstein was speaking of are what led to the strike, which began nationwide yesterday, though the majority of picket lines are in the Los Angeles area. The WGA (West and East) called the strike just before midnight on May 1, with its leadership unanimously voting for a work stoppage after six weeks of negotiations with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) over a new three-year contract that covers some 11,500 film and television writers. Announcing its decision, the union said that the bargaining table responses of the AMPTP, which consists of Amazon, Apple, Discovery-Warner, Disney, NBC Universal, Netflix, Paramount, and Sony, had “been wholly insufficient given the existential crisis writers are facing.”

A document released by the WGA shows the distance between the two sides: on several of the writers’ key issues, the studios rejected the unions’ proposal and failed to offer a counterproposal.

“When you look at the things that the studios flatly refused on altogether, they’re not money, they’re working conditions,” says Adam Conover, the creator of Adam Ruins Everything and a member of the WGA negotiating committee. He spoke to me by phone from Los Angeles, where he spent the first day picketing outside of the Netflix building and fielding press requests. At one point yesterday, he criticized the $250 million salary of Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav during an interview on CNN, which is owned by Warner Bros. Discovery (“Because you ruin everything, you may have just ruined my career, but I don’t mind,” joked CNN anchor Sara Sidner as she ended her interview with Conover.)

Went on CNN to explain why writers are striking, ended up roasting their bosses’ salary. pic.twitter.com/Si4HHDVuM8

— Adam Conover (@adamconover) May 2, 2023

“When it comes to the working conditions that studios won’t touch, a good example is that screenwriters have a huge problem with free work,” explains Conover. “Screenwriters are paid in two big chunks: one at the beginning and one at the end, which gives the producer the power to hold the last payment over them and get them to do extra drafts before they release the payment.”

The unions sought to rectify the problem by proposing that screenwriters be paid weekly. It’s a zero-cost proposal, but the studios refused to offer a counter. “It’s because they like getting the free work and they like having the power over us,” says Conover.

Another priority for the WGA is a staffing requirement for television shows. The rise of streaming, which now generates the bulk of the industry’s profits, has brought a proliferation of “mini-rooms,” primarily consisting of a showrunner aided by one or a few writers. That change has not only meant overwork for those in such rooms, but a reduction in writing work altogether. When the WGA proposed to regulate such understaffing, the AMPTP refused.

“When they refuse to even talk about that proposal — they would not bring it up in the room — it makes it clear that their intention is to eliminate writers’ rooms,” says Conover.

He noted that while the studios offered to create a minimum pay floor for comedy/variety shows (daytime and late-night television) that currently lack such a standard, they also are insisting on a day rate, meaning that rather than the thirteen-week contracts that are the current norm for such writers, they could instead be hired by the day.

The studios want to gigify writing.

“That would create incredible precarity and turn late-night writing from a career into a gig that stand-up comics could do one day a week,” says Conover.

In other words, the terms of the strike are stark: the studios want to gigify writing, eroding the stability on which the career, and the work it produces, depends as well reducing the number of jobs that exist.

Additionally, distance remains between the two sides on the matter of residuals, the money writers receive when their work gets reused. That income cushions the frequent downtime between jobs and can account for a significant proportion of a writer’s annual earnings. Writers receive far lower residuals for streaming than for broadcast television, and now that the former dominates the industry and nearly half of all writers are working for the contract’s minimum compensation level regardless of experience, the current setup leaves them unable to make a living. A WGA report finds that writer pay has declined 4 percent over the past decade, which amounts to 23 percent when adjusted for inflation.

There is also the matter of artificial intelligence (AI). The writers want to regulate its use, proposing that AI “can’t write or rewrite literary material” or be “used as source material.” The AMPTP countered by offering “annual meetings to discuss advancements in technology.”

“We thought that one would be an easy layup for them, since AI is not currently usable in any shape or form and it’s not even clear that its output is copyrightable,” says Conover. But the studios’ response suggests to the writers that the issue is of greater importance than they’d realized when they began formulating the proposals six months ago.

Says Conover, “It’s like if you ask someone, ‘Hey, would you agree that you’re not going to pull out a gun and shoot me in the stomach?’ And the person says, ‘I’m not going to agree to that.’ Suddenly you think, ‘Wait, I didn’t think you were going to do that, but now I’m worried that you are or else you’d agree to not do it.’”

Back in New York, workers from the city’s television shows were well represented on the picket line. Saturday Night Live cast members Aidy Bryant and Sarah Sherman walked alongside several of the show’s writers. (This week’s episode, which was to be hosted by former SNL cast member Pete Davidson, has now been scrapped.) The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon announcer and SNL producer Steve Higgins was on the picket line as well. As late-night shows across the networks go dark, one nonunion Fallon employee says that the staff and crew were told yesterday that NBC would stop paying them at the end of the week and end their health insurance after this month should the strike still be ongoing.

Other entertainment industry unions were present in Manhattan as well. Screen Actors Guild–American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), Directors Guild of America (DGA), and International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees (IATSE) members held signs representing their respective unions, and conversation among picketers frequently turned to whether the directors, who are set to begin their own negotiations with the AMPTP on May 10, might strike too. Their contract expires on June 30, as does SAG-AFTRA’s. The DGA’s decision to negotiate a weak deal during the last writers’ strike in 2007 has not been forgotten by WGA members, but some suspect that the directors are more willing to fight alongside them this time around.

As for the connections between the workers, all of whom are affected by the current strike as productions begin to shut down nationwide, Joey Winterbotham, a member of IATSE Local 700, the motion picture editors’ guild, told me that the reasons for solidarity are straightforward.

“The WGA’s wins are our wins,” said Winterbotham. “We all negotiate against the AMPTP, and we know as a local how they are at the bargaining table, and it’s not very good. I don’t blame the WGA or anyone else who goes on strike; I blame the corporations, the producers, and the people at the head of these systems who are refusing to pay a fair wage. It wasn’t the WGA who brought us here. It was the AMPTP.”

“I was pretty shocked when I saw the degree to which the studios do not seem to be negotiating in good faith at all,” elected WGA-East council member Josh Gondelman told me when I got him off the picket line for an interview. Gondelman, who was a writer for Last Week Tonight With John Oliver as well as a writer and producer for Desus and Mero, said that he was surprised by how little the AMPTP seemed to be bargaining over the writers’ priorities.

“We are on strike because this is an existential negotiation for writing as a profession,” said Gondelman, “and what the studios are saying is, ‘We want to give you as little as we can get away with, as infrequently as we can.’ It’s outrageous to me given how much money is now being made off of our backs. Meanwhile, even the writers who are ‘making it’ are sometimes not making it.”

“If the WGA’s proposals aren’t met, television writing as a profession probably won’t exist in the future,” What We Do in the Shadows writer Rajat Suresh told me. “But honestly, that makes total sense, because if you think about it, when people watch a show, they’re usually like, ‘I’ve gotta see this new David Zaslav show coming out,’” he said sarcastically, referring to the Warner Bros. Discovery CEO. “I can’t tell you how many people I meet who are the biggest Ted Sarandos superfans in the world. These guys are the real creative geniuses behind all your favorite shows.”

Even seasoned WGA members were taken aback by the lack of progress at the bargaining table. Melissa Salmons has been in the union since 1987 when she began writing on soap operas like Days of Our Lives and As the World Turns. She was on the WGA negotiating committee in 2007, when an impasse led to a one-hundred-day strike, and she told me that she suspects the studios’ intransigence may have something to do with the divergent interests of the AMPTP’s members. Amazon’s financial models and business concerns may not be the same as those of Warner Bros. Discovery or Netflix, but they all speak in one voice during negotiations.

When I floated that speculation to Conover, he agreed that the growing heterogeneity of the AMPTP’s members might explain some of their intransigence at the bargaining table, but noted that because of the AMPTP’s unity in the negotiating room, the WGA has no evidence of that.

It’s hard to see how the disagreement gets resolved quickly. The 2007–8 strike lasted one hundred days, and the one before that, in 1987–88, went on for five months. Members of the negotiating committee told the Hollywood Reporter that even as the union compromised on several of their proposals, the studios remained unwilling to give writers a say in their Wall Street–backed transformation of the entertainment industry in search of exponential growth. As WGA negotiating cochair David Goodman told the trade publication, “With a union sometimes in order to get what you need, you need to exercise your power. . . . That will really be the determining factor of when we make a deal with the AMPTP — the pain that we’re about to inflict on this business by withholding our work.”

Israeli guards thwart weapons-smuggling from Gaza, arms hidden in furniture

Security guards thwarted an attempt to smuggle weapons from the Gaza Strip to Judea and Samaria.

By World Israel News Staff

Israel Ministry of Defense security guards thwarted an attempt to smuggle firearms, silencers and cartridges en en route from the Gaza Strip to Palestinian-administered areas of Judea and Samaria on Wednesday.

A furniture shipment from Gaza to Judea and Samaria aroused the guards’ suspicion, the Ministry said.

A closer inspection uncovered various types of firearms hidden inside the furniture in addition to loaded cartridges and silencers that were also confiscated.

According to initial assessments, the weapons were allegedly shipped for terror activity in Judea and Samaria and were transferred to security forces for further review.

Less than two weeks ago, Amman’s Foreign Ministry has confirmed that a Jordanian lawmaker was arrested by Israel after being caught smuggling hundreds of weapons and massive amounts of gold into Israel.

The lawmaker, identified as Imad Al-Adwan, was said to have been arrested crossing the Allenby Bridge border crossing, located approximately five kilometers east of the Palestinian Authority-administered city of Jericho, Jordanian media reported.

The post Israeli guards thwart weapons-smuggling from Gaza, arms hidden in furniture appeared first on World Israel News.

‘Calm down’: Smotrich rebukes coalition partners for public squabbles

The Religious Zionism party leader tried easing tensions, likely to prevent the government from collapsing.

By TPS

Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich called on his coalition partners to tone down the rhetoric after some of them publicly criticized policies of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday.

National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, who leads the right-wing Otzma Yehudit (Jewish Strength) party, which ran on a joint list for the Knesset with Smotrich’s Religious Zionism Party, complained that the government did not make a strong enough response to Tuesday’s launching of more than 100 rockets at Israel by terrorists based in Gaza. Furthermore, the party boycotted voting in the Knesset.

“Following the weak response in Gaza tonight, the Otzma Yehudit faction decided not to attend the Knesset votes today and will hold a special faction meeting in the city of Sderot,” Ben-Gvir stated.

Hours later, the Likud issued a statement condemning the boycott and inviting Otzma Yehudit to bolt the government if dissatisfied with Netanyahu’s leadership.

Tensions increased, with Ben-Gvir responding, “Mr. Prime Minister, if you don’t want Otzma Yehudit in your government, you are welcome to fire us. If you don’t want a fully right-wing government, you are welcome to send us home.”

Also on Wednesday, ultra-orthodox leaders criticized Netanyahu for not pushing through a new law making military deferments for yeshiva students permanents.

“My friends and partners in the government and coalition, let’s calm down,” Smotrich said.

“Internal discussions and debates can and should be conducted, and there is definitely a lot to improve,” he continued.

“But we must keep the government united and not give a reward to terrorism and bring the left with the supporters of terrorism to power. We have four years to fix and improve by working hard and together.”

World Israel News contributed to this report.

The post ‘Calm down’: Smotrich rebukes coalition partners for public squabbles appeared first on World Israel News.

New York’s Left Eked Out a Few Victories in an Otherwise Dismal Austerity Budget

Socialists and progressives won a few key demands in the New York state budget battles. But overall, Gov. Kathy Hochul rammed through an awful budget that will make life much worse for the state of New York’s working class.

For the most part, New York governor Kathy Hochul made sure that the state budget this year was as punitive and stingy as possible. (Lev Radin / Pacific Press / LightRocket via Getty Images)

On Tuesday, thanks to socialist and progressive organizing, New York enacted the biggest state-level climate bill ever, one that is destined to become a model for governments everywhere. Socialists and their allies can also claim credit for significant improvements to New York City’s public transit system. The budget that passed with these policies is otherwise an awful austerity budget across a range of issues, but these wins are significant and demonstrate the power of socialist organizing on popular, urgent issues.

After a four-year fight, the Build Public Renewables Act (BPRA), the beginning of a Green New Deal in New York, is a reality. This bill uses a New Deal model of public ownership to advance renewable energy and ensure that it remains a public good, affordable to New Yorkers and a source of tens of thousands of good, unionized, green jobs.

BPRA includes labor protections — written by the state AFL-CIO and resisted by the governor — as well as an Office of Just Transition to ensure that fossil fuel workers can move into good green energy jobs. BPRA also improves public health and attacks environmental racism by shutting down toxic fracked gas power plants in black and brown communities. It ensures that New York will have access to the funds offered by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and that the state will be able to use that federal funding to create lasting structures for public green energy.

The previous day, socialists and their allies also won victories in a campaign called #FixtheMTA. They secured funding to save the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) from serious fiscal trouble, reduce a proposed fare hike, provide more frequent subway service on nights and weekends, improve enforcement of bus-only street lanes, and make several bus lines free. This victory will greatly ease many New Yorkers’ everyday lives. And every improvement to transit gets cars off the street, cleaning up our air and reducing carbon emissions.

Kathy Hochul’s refusal to compromise on the housing issues, or to increase taxes on the rich, amounts to unconscionable violence against ordinary New Yorkers.

These wins are especially remarkable because otherwise, the governor made sure that the final budget was as punitive and stingy as possible. The state assembly and state senate initially passed draft budgets that included good-cause eviction and other left demands; had those budgets passed, they would have been the most progressive budget in New York State this century, a testament to the power the Left has been building in this state, especially over the last five years.

Instead, Governor Kathy Hochul rejected those progressive proposals in the budget bills that she signed, and failed to invest in public schools, choosing to fund privatization of the education system, a remedy beloved by her hedge-funder donors. She rolled back bail reform, a move that will make no one safer from crime and will result in more poor and working-class New Yorkers spending time in jail just because they can’t pay to get out. She also rejected tenant protections even though housing precarity and homelessness is wreaking havoc on people’s lives and contributing to crime and instability in our communities. Her refusal to compromise on the housing issues, or to increase taxes on the rich, amounts to unconscionable violence against ordinary New Yorkers.

The defeats were so significant that Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is not celebrating, despite the significance of BPRA and the transit wins. The socialist state senators and assembly members voted no on the budget and put out a joint statement yesterday, denouncing Hochul’s “austerity budget.”

Still, the movement matters. None of the good in this budget would have happened without hard work of not just DSA but the broad coalitions that include other groups who have been working on the issues for many years.

On the MTA campaign, groups like Riders Alliance and New York Communities for Change were crucial. On BPRA, DSA and Sunrise chapters throughout the state worked with Sane Energy Project, Food & Water Action, and other left environmental groups as well as labor unions like United Auto Workers Region 9A (of which I am a member and serve on its Community Action Program council). The grassroots organizing for publicly funded renewables and transit bult a broad base of engaged support for policies that are already incredibly popular.

Socialists organized for BPRA for years, making it the centerpiece of three electoral campaigns, two of which were victorious: Queens state senator Kristen Gonzalez and Hudson Valley assemblywoman Sarahana Shrestha. According to NYC-DSA, more than four thousand New Yorkers participated in the #FixtheMTA campaign that led to the public transit improvements, canvassing fellow New Yorkers at subway and bus stops. As socialist assemblymember Zohran Kwame Mamdani says, “It was powerful to speak to people about the very service they were waiting to use.

Another, perhaps obvious lesson: the Left must get strong enough to win executive power at the mayoral and gubernatorial level. Socialists and progressives can get their ideas heard and even supported in the legislature now to a degree that would have been unthinkable five years ago. But just as we’re seeing at the city level, a conservative Democrat in an executive position, working with the real estate industry, can lay waste to many good redistributionist plans.

Governor Hochul needs to go, no question, and the crimes she has perpetrated in this budget against tenants and all working-class New Yorkers will be remembered. But New York socialists won big victories this week, and those wins, too, deserve our attention.