Intelligence chief, Netanyahu’s most senior aides in Washington amid security concerns – report

The White House confirmed its meetings with Netanyahu’s most senior aides regarding the Iranian threat, but there has been no official comment about the Shin Bet director’s visit to Washington.

By World Israel News Staff

Ronen Bar, director of Shin Bet, Israel’s internal security agency, is in Washington this week for discussions with the Biden administration, Axios reported.

As noted by Axios, Bar is the most senior intelligence authority regarding Judea and Samaria and the Gaza Strip and carries great influence on Israeli government policy.

The report stresses concerns in both Washington and Jerusalem about the instability of the Palestinian Authority – currently led by the widely unpopular Mahmoud Abbas – and the possibility of a new intifada.

The Palestinian public in the PA-administered territories appears to favor Hamas, the terrorist organization that rules Gaza, over the PA. Representatives from Hamas won a plurality of seats on Birzeit University’s student council, in a clear example of the terror group’s growing popularity among Palestinians living in Judea and Samaria.

Bar is expected to meet with senior CIA and White House officials, sources told Axios.

National Security Advisor Tzachi Hanegbi and Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer are also in Washington, where they met on Thursday with White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan.

According to a White House briefing, Sullivan hosted the Israeli officials “to discuss a broad range of global and regional issues of mutual concern.

“Following up on the March U.S.-Israel Strategic Consultative Group, they continued discussions on enhanced coordination to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, and ways to counter threats from Iran and its proxies.

“Mr. Sullivan reaffirmed the Administration’s goal of further enhancing Israel’s security and economic integration throughout the Middle East.  Mr. Sullivan also stressed the need to take additional steps to improve the lives of Palestinians, critical to realizing a more peaceful, prosperous, and integrated region.

“Finally, Mr. Sullivan discussed our shared concern with Russia’s deepening military relationship with Iran, and the importance of supporting Ukraine in the defense of its territory and citizenry, including from Iranian drones,” the readout said.

Reports suggest disagreement between Israel and the US administration and that Israel is concerned about the possibility of a revived Iran nuclear deal.

“I have heard all of the reports about Iran. I have a sharp and clear message for both Iran and the international community: Israel will do whatever it needs to do to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated Thursday evening.

The post Intelligence chief, Netanyahu’s most senior aides in Washington amid security concerns – report appeared first on World Israel News.

The Debt Ceiling Deal Is Not a “Victory”

The deal that brought an end to the debt ceiling circus is not good — and Democrats didn’t have to let it become this bad.

President Joe Biden speaks on the debt limit vote process during a meeting with leaders of federal emergency preparedness and response teams in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on May 31, 2023, in Washington, DC. (Win McNamee / Getty Images)

One of the old clichés in Beltway reporting is that there’s some inherent good in “getting things done.” Centrist politicians have long adored the phrase too, largely because it’s so devoid of actual content. To centrist liberals, it has the added bonus of being a handy cudgel with which to bludgeon a Left they insist is too puritanical to muddy itself in the grown-up business of gutting social programs or genuflecting to Wall Street. Infantile progressivism cleaves to impractical ideas like people not being homeless or dying because they can’t afford to see a doctor; adult politics “gets things done.”

So it was probably inevitable that the Joe Biden/Kevin McCarthy deal to raise America’s debt ceiling would radiate some of the familiar rhetoric. Characteristic is Politico’s write-up, which reports the circumstances surrounding the agreement with a dollop of dramatic flair, breathlessly revealing the extensive maneuvers in political management that finally handed “a major victory [to] Biden,” the consummate dealmaker. With assists from elsewhere in the media, the White House is unsurprisingly spinning it this way too.

As ever, the whole thing falls apart the moment you look at what’s actually in the deal or consider what the alternatives to the periodic debt ceiling brokerage there might have been. The Democrats could have raised the debt ceiling at any time during their recent control of Congress and avoided this affair entirely. The debt ceiling being an unusual institution to begin with, they could also have eliminated it altogether (an option Biden casually dismissed last October, deeming it “irresponsible”).

Barring these, Biden could simply have invoked the Fourteenth Amendment, which states “the validity of the public debt of the United States . . . shall not be questioned,” and the government could have continued borrowing.

In lieu of these options, there is now a deal that prioritizes Republican cuts, adds Dickensian work requirements to food aid programs, and worsens climate change.

To this end, a measure included in last year’s Inflation Reduction Act to allocate an additional $80 billion to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) so it could be better equipped to stop rich people from evading taxes is being pared back to $20 billion. Construction of a new greenhouse-gas-spewing pipeline will also be expedited.

When asked about his deal’s inevitable pushing of low-income Americans into hunger, Biden simply waved away the claim as a “ridiculous assertion” — a contemptible dismissal given what detailed analyses like this one from the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities reveal about the agreement’s impact on people in poverty:

The debt ceiling agreement, which includes almost all of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) changes from the House-passed debt-ceiling-and-cuts bill, would put almost 750,000 older adults aged fifty to fifty-four at risk of losing food assistance through an expansion of the existing, failed SNAP work-reporting requirement. The expansion of this requirement would take food assistance away from large numbers of people, including many who have serious barriers to employment.

Only in the hollowest and most superficial sense imaginable is the debt ceiling agreement any kind of political “win.” Indeed, it’s incredible to think there are people out there who could read a sentence like, “While the precise details were not clear, the deal raises the age at which adults will be required to work to receive food stamps from 50 to 54” and get the impression there’s some kind of victory to be found here. In a bizarro world where political outcomes are primarily about the elite characters who made them happen rather than the people they will actually affect, virtually anything — no matter how morally horrendous — can be declared a win.

If nothing else, it’s a timely reminder that, for many of the most prominent people involved in deciding how America taxes, spends, and supports (or doesn’t support) its citizens, all of this is barely more than theater.

WHO Initiative Would ‘Promote Desired Behaviors’ by Surveilling Social Media

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article

The post WHO Initiative Would ‘Promote Desired Behaviors’ by Surveilling Social Media appeared first on Global Research.

Global Coup d’État and the “Great Reset”. Global Debt and Neoliberal “Shock Treatment”

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article

The post Global Coup d’État and the “Great Reset”. Global Debt and Neoliberal “Shock Treatment” appeared first on Global Research.

Many in UK academic community forced to hide Jewish identity: report

At least one campus group for Jewish students is phasing out any programming related to Israel altogether because it sets off a viscerally negative response from their anti-Zionist peers.

By Dion J. Pierre, The Algemeiner

Pervasive antisemitism and anti-Zionism at UK universities is forcing members of the Jewish academic community to conceal their identities on campus, according to a new report issued by the Parliamentary Task Force on Antisemitism in Higher Education, a committee of lawmakers and established by former Prime Minister Boris Johnson in 2022 in response to complaints of anti-Jewish racism and discrimination.

“We were told it was commonplace for Jewish students to choose not to wear certain clothing or jewelry around campus because it would make them visibly identifiable as Jewish,” the Task Force wrote in the report, titled Understanding Jewish Experience in Higher Education, noting that academic staff “also raised important comparable concerns about negativity surrounding their Jewish identity.”

The Task Force recommended that all universities adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, which, it said, has not, contrary to the claims of its many opponents, diminished free speech and academic freedom. Last November, over 100 scholars from across the world said in an open letter that it has, arguing that pro-Zionist activists “hijacked” the definition to censor criticism of Israel.

“The [IHRA] definition of antisemitism has neither compromised nor chilled free speech in any of the 56 universities with which we engaged,” the report said. “The IHRA definition should be used as a reference point to understand what contemporary antisemitism is. It should also be used as a reference point for Jewish students and staff (and indeed non-Jewish complainants where relevant) to support them when dealing with issues or submitting complaints.”

Jewish students’ feeling that they have been victimized by their peers arises from the treatment they receive because of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the report explains. The report describes an interview with a Jewish student who experienced a torrent of verbal abuse for four hours, as well as incessant phone calls, after being outed as a Zionist in a WhatsApp group chat. Such behavior influenced Jewish students’ choices on which courses to take, with one Newcastle University student reporting that registering for a class on the Middle East was ruled out for fear of being held “responsible for defending Israel when discussing the conflict.”

According to the report, at least one campus group for Jewish students, the Exeter Jewish Society of University of Exeter, is phasing out any programming related to Israel altogether because it sets off a viscerally negative response from their anti-Zionist peers.

“That any society should have to factor such a concern into the decision making is troubling,” the report continued. It also noted that Jewish students and staff avoid being on campus during so-called “Israel Apartheid Week” because of “aggressive” behavior “such as imitation checkpoints and protests using antisemitic imagery,” a problem that is also widespread in the US, according to a new report issued by Combat Antisemitism Movement, an antisemitism watchdog that has called for a ban on the practice.

The Parliamentary Task Force recommended that universities institute antisemitism training, reporting systems for collecting and responding to complaints of antisemitism, rules on appropriate social media conduct, and “inclusive” calendars informing professors and staff of important Jewish holidays and sabbath observance, as well as “reasonable adjustments” for students and staff keeping kosher.

The National Union of Students (NUS), a private charity representing over seven million university students in the UK, was previously scrutinized for inciting antisemitism in higher education, a longstanding behavior for which the group apologized in March.

‘Considerable alienation of Jewish students’

In January, an independent report commissioned by NUS said that a fixation on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the organization had caused “considerable alienation of Jewish students” as well as other forms of antisemitism that its leaders never properly addressed. It additionally cited dozens of examples of antisemitic incidents alleged by Jewish students — incitement of violence against Israeli civilians, the spreading of conspiracy theories about Mossad’s rumored role in the Union of Jewish Students (UJS), and opposition to a motion proposing observance of Holocaust Memorial Day — many of which occurred at NUS conferences.

In November NUS terminated the presidency of Shaima Dallali after finding her guilty of antisemitism and other misconduct. In announcing the removal, the first in the organization’s 100 year history, NUS apologized for “the harm that has been caused” and pledged to “rebuild the NUS in an inclusive way — fighting for all students as we have done for the past 100 years.”

Dallali’s tenure at NUS brimmed with controversy ever since Jewish student rights groups discovered tweets in which she called Hamas critics “Dirty Zionists” and quoted the battle cry, “Khaybar, Khaybar o Jews, the army of Muhammad will return,” a reference to the Battle of Khaybar in 628 that resulted in a massacre of Jews. She had also praised the extremist Islamic preacher Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who supports Palestinian suicide bombers and is banned from visiting four western countries and regarded as a terrorist by several Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates.

At one point, antisemitic conduct within NUS became so common and egregious that the UK government dissociated with it and suspended its funding.

The post Many in UK academic community forced to hide Jewish identity: report appeared first on World Israel News.

Booted: Spanish mayor who boycotted Israel loses election

Calau lost to a former mayor who she unseated eight years ago.

By World Israel News Staff

Outgoing Barcelona Mayor Ada Calau, a pro-Palestinian activist who recently severed ties with Tel Aviv, lost the municipal election this week to candidate Xavier Trias’ Calau, a former mayor whom she beat in 2015.

In February, Calau, who supports the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, announced on social media her decision to end the 25-year-long twin-city arrangement with Tel Aviv.

“At the request of more than 100 entities and thousands of Barcelona neighbors, I have just communicated to Netanyahu that we suspend institutional relations with the State of Israel due to the repeated violations of human rights of the Palestinian population and non-compliance with United Nations resolutions,” she wrote on Facebook in Spanish, and on Instagram.

The city will maintain relations with “Israeli and Palestinian entities that continue to work for peace and against apartheid,” she added.

It appears that the statement by Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lior Haiat, saying the decision was “in complete contrast to the position of the majority of the residents of Barcelona and their representatives in the city council,” was correct, judging by her loss.

“The friendship between Israel and Barcelona is long-standing, and is based on shared culture and values. Even this unfortunate decision will not damage this friendship,” Haiat said.

The Spanish government slammed Calau’s decision.

Several weeks later, a Jewish house of worship in Barcelona was vandalized; it was the second such incident in the city in less than 10 days, JNS reported at the time.

Graffiti reading “Why do you kill in Palestine” was spray-painted outside a Chabad synagogue in the city.

In the first incident, the Great Synagogue of Barcelona was defaced with graffiti reading, “Free Palestine from the river to the sea.”

Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt, the president of the Conference of European Rabbis, blamed that desecration on Barcelona Mayor Ada Colau’s decision to sever the city’s twinning agreement with Tel Aviv.

“The irresponsible decision of the mayor of Barcelona to unilaterally sever relations with the State of Israel has put the Jewish community in the city in real danger,” said Goldschmidt. “Every additional case of vandalism and bloodshed as a result of this unfortunate choice will be on her hands.”

The Lawfare Project filed a lawsuit against Calau in April. “The suspension of relations with Israel represents a total misuse of the legal process to engage in a bigoted and partisan campaign, rather than a legal decision within the scope of the Mayor of Barcelona’s power,” explained LP’s executive director Brooke Goldstein.

The post Booted: Spanish mayor who boycotted Israel loses election appeared first on World Israel News.

Latest Kosovo escalation shows just how ‘stabilizing’ NATO’s illegal presence is

This is yet another proof that the US readiness to engage with the most radical groups to further its geopolitical goals is bound to backfire virtually every time. The illegal entity in Pristina was founded by a volatile mix of Islamic and narco-terrorists with close links to Al Qaeda and even ISIS. Washington DC itself has had them on its list of terrorist organizations until 1998.