Germany’s Siemens facing scrutiny in U.S. for agreeing to Turkish demands to boycott Israel

Records show Siemens agreed to boycott of Israeli goods to secure $360 million deal with Turkey.

By Alana Goodman, Washington Free Beacon

Germany-based conglomerate Siemens agreed to boycott Israeli products to secure a $360 million deal to provide Turkey with high-speed trains, according to copy of the contract obtained by a pro-Israel watchdog group that contradicts months of public denials from the company.

The agreement, which includes a signature and seal from Siemens, has a provision that “providers of goods and works, and their associates and subcontractors, shall be in strict compliance with the Boycott Regulations of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, the League of Arab States, and the Organization of the African Union.” The Organization of the Islamic Conference enforces a boycott of Israel.

The news could raise legal issues for Siemens in the United States, where multiple states have instituted financial penalties for companies that participate in anti-Israel boycotts. The Zachor Legal Institute, the watchdog group that obtained a copy of the contract, said it has added Siemens to its list of scrutinized companies.

“Although modern-day Siemens has expressed regret for their use of forced labor during the Nazi regime, this new evidence of boycotting Israel indicates that this company is still willing to prioritize profits by engaging in economic warfare, this time against the Jewish State of Israel,” said Ron Machol of the Zachor Legal Institute.

New York and Arizona officials told the Washington Free Beacon they are looking into the allegations to see if any action is necessary under the states’ anti-boycott laws.

Siemens has for months denied a report by German media outlet Südwestrundfunk that the company signed on to the anti-Israel provision as part of the $360 million Turkish railway deal in 2018.

“Neither Siemens AG nor Siemens Turkey signed a boycott declaration in 2018 in connection with the tender for high-speed trains,” said Florian Martini, a spokesman for Siemens, in February.

Siemens spokesman Wolfram Trost sent the Free Beacon an identical statement when asked this week about the contract. He declined to comment when asked if Siemens agreed to comply with the boycott regulations of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, as stated in the contract.

The Zachor Legal Institute said it has raised the matter with several state law enforcement bodies. At least 36 states have laws or orders opposing the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement. Some of these laws limit government-related business with companies that boycott Israel, such as public pension fund investments or contracting work.

Arizona has been one of the most active states on this issue and has blacklisted 19 companies, including Unilever, Danske Bank, and SNS Bank. State treasurer Kimberly Yee (R.) told the Free Beacon that the state doesn’t have any investments with Siemens but that her staff will “monitor the allegations raised on this issue to see what actions, if any, are necessary.”

“The Arizona Treasury diligently follows our state’s anti-BDS law,” said Yee. “When credible evidence exists that a company is in violation of Arizona law, our staff investigates the issue and then takes appropriate steps.”

New York, which holds investments in Siemens through its state pension fund, said it is also looking into the issue. Matthew Sweeney, a spokesman for New York comptroller Thomas DiNapoli (D.), told the Free Beacon that the office is “aware of the published reports and will be looking into the matter according to our regular review process.”

DiNapoli previously warned companies that “there will be consequences if their anti-Israel activities expose our investments to financial harm.”

The post Germany’s Siemens facing scrutiny in U.S. for agreeing to Turkish demands to boycott Israel appeared first on World Israel News.

Blinken to AIPAC: Israel faces ‘no greater danger’ than Iran but diplomacy is the way to go

The Biden administration continues to believe that a diplomatic solution would be the best way to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.

By Andrew Bernard, Algemeiner

In an address to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) on Monday, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said that the United states would use all means to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.

“There is no danger that Israel faces that is greater than the one posed by the Iranian regime,” Blinken said. “That regime routinely threatens to wipe Israel off the map. It continues to provide weapons to terrorists and proxies like Hezbollah and Hamas, who reject Israel’s right to exist.”

Blinken said, however, that the Biden administration continues to believe that a diplomatic solution would be the best way to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, but said that if Iran rejects the path of diplomacy that “all options are on the table.” Blinken added that the administration’s “three-pronged approach” of diplomacy, economic pressure, and military deterrence has bipartisan support, and that this year the US and Israel will hold more joint military exercises than ever before.

Current and former Israeli officials on Thursday reacted negatively to news reports that the United States is considering a new diplomatic push to return to some form of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action – the 2015 Iran nuclear deal.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu released a video saying that Israel would do “whatever it needs to” to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, while former Israeli ambassador to the UN Danny Danon said a return to the deal would be “a historic mistake and a disaster for generations to come.”

“It is not possible or logical to sign an agreement with a murderous terrorist state whose aim is to destroy Israel and the US,” Danon wrote on Twitter. “Iran’s dangerous nuclear project can only be shut down with crippling sanctions and a credible military threat.”

In his address to AIPAC Monday, Blinken also described efforts to build on the Trump administration’s efforts to achieve peace between Israel and other Arab and Muslim states that culminated in the 2020 Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab states.

“The United States has a real national security interest in promoting normalization between Israel and Saudi Arabia,” Blinken said. “We believe that we can and indeed we must play an integral role in advancing it. Now, there are no illusions that this can be done quickly or easily. But we remain committed to working toward that outcome, including on the trip I’m about to take this week to Jeddah and Riyadh for engagements with our Saudi and Gulf counterparts.”

Blinken said, however, that normalization between Israel and neighboring Arab states should also further efforts to achieve a two-state solution between Israelis and Palestinians, and that in order to preserve the “horizon of hope” for such a solution, both sides would need to reject violence and unilateral actions.

“Settlement expansion clearly presents an obstacle to the horizon of hope that we seek,” he said. “Likewise, any move toward annexation of the West Bank de facto or de jure, disruption of the historic status quo at the holy sites, the continuing demolitions of homes and the evictions of families that have lived in those homes for generations damage the prospects for two states.”

The post Blinken to AIPAC: Israel faces ‘no greater danger’ than Iran but diplomacy is the way to go appeared first on World Israel News.

WATCH – Elon Musk to Netanyahu: Israel can be ‘significant’ player in future of AI

The tycoon told Netanyahu that governments should understand both the opportunities and the dangers posed by artificial intelligence.

The post WATCH – Elon Musk to Netanyahu: Israel can be ‘significant’ player in future of AI appeared first on World Israel News.

In This Is Not Miami, Fernanda Melchor Transforms Violence Into Folklore

Folk fairy tales are populated with violent sadists, monstrous figures who take their hatred out on those closest to them: there is the witch in “Hansel and Gretel” who fattens the young boy up to make him more appetizing; the stepmother in “The Juniper Tree” who kills her stepson and feeds him to his own […]

Issue 49: Inside the Teamsters’ Preparations for a UPS Strike

This summer could see 350,000 UPS workers walk off the job in the United States’ largest strike in decades. The Teamsters are getting ready. Here’s a look at how.

A driver sits at the wheel of a ubiquitous UPS delivery truck in San Francisco, California, January 31, 2023. More
than a quarter million of these drivers are represented by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. (Justin Sullivan / Getty Images)

Sorry, this articles is available to subscriber only. Click here to subscribe.

With the Debt Ceiling Deal, Joe Biden Has Abandoned Student Debtors

As part of the debt ceiling deal, Joe Biden forfeited his authority to help student debtors and set a ticking time bomb for tens of millions of Americans whose student loan payments are about to restart.

President Joe Biden addresses the nation on averting default and the Bipartisan Budget Agreement in the Oval Office of the White House on June 2, 2023, in Washington, DC. (Jim Watson-Pool / Getty Images)

What President Joe Biden is selling as a win for student loan borrowers in the debt ceiling deal is actually a forfeiture of his own authority to help debtors and a ticking time bomb for tens of millions of Americans. Biden could still move to save his student debt cancellation agenda from conservative sabotage — but instead his administration has been downplaying the threat and assuring borrowers that everything is going to be just fine.

Student loan payments have been on pause for the past three years, as part of a COVID-19-era relief program initiated by former president Donald Trump. In one of a series of concessions to Republicans during the recent debt ceiling standoff, Biden must restart student loan payments by the end of this summer.

That means more than forty million Americans will be once again crushed by debt, but it also strips Biden of his best tool to defend his broader student debt cancellation program: delay. His order to cancel up to $20,000 in debt for federal borrowers is expected to be struck down by the Supreme Court any day now — making it an inopportune moment for Biden to relinquish his power to extend the payment pause.

Democrats could have avoided this scenario. But they refused to get rid of the debt ceiling, an arbitrary limit on government borrowing, when they controlled the House and Senate during the first two years of Biden’s term. Then, instead of bypassing it unilaterally using executive authority, Biden chose to negotiate with Republicans, making major concessions — including his own power to keep the student loan payment pause in place — to raise the ceiling for just two years. In doing so, Biden may be cementing his decades-long legacy as a defender of student debt.

There are still tools available to Biden to enact his student debt program, but the options are limited, and the time left to move on them is dwindling.

“We have moved mountains to get to this point,” said Thomas Gokey, cofounder of the Debt Collective, a debtors’ union that has been pushing for universal student debt cancellation. “To have the whole thing sabotaged by the Biden administration is a bitter, bitter pill.”

“He Rolled Out the Red Carpet for Republicans”

Biden’s student debt cancellation program began with a campaign trail promise, and is now turning into a pipe dream as the president negotiates away his own power to provide relief to borrowers.

When Congress was negotiating a COVID relief package in March 2020, Biden argued from the campaign trail that the bill should cancel a minimum of $10,000 in debt per federal borrower. The legislation Trump ultimately signed didn’t cancel any student debt, but it paused payments and interest accrual.

Biden promised additional relief. At a town hall just before the November election, he told voters, “I’m going to make sure everyone gets $10,000 knocked off of their student debt.”

Finally, in August 2022, after more than a year of pressure to fulfill his campaign promise, Biden signed an executive order that canceled $10,000 in debt for some federal borrowers and up to $20,000 for Pell Grant recipients.

But the cancellation didn’t go into effect right away, because Biden means-tested the cancellation, which meant it only applied to people who made less than $125,000 per year, and required debtors to submit applications to claim relief — a time-consuming process. In the meantime, conservatives found plaintiffs who were willing to sue to block Biden’s plan.

“They didn’t even start the application process until a month after they made the initial announcement,” said Luke Herrine, a law professor at the University of Alabama and student debt expert. “There was no reason for the delay, I think, except to see who decided to sue.” By waiting for lawsuits, explained Herrine, the administration could potentially adjust the program in response.

But instead, the strategy made the program vulnerable. “If they had forced the Supreme Court to make a decision that didn’t just stop [the cancellation program] but actually forced the court to reenact debt, I think that would be a different situation,” said Herrine, because of the logistical challenge and potential political backlash of reimposing already-canceled debt.

In other words, said Gokey, “He rolled out the red carpet for Republicans to try to kill it.”

Biden’s cancellation program was halted in November by legal challenges before it took effect, and is likely to be struck down by the Supreme Court any day now — in a case that bypassed normal fact-finding procedures and stands on extremely dubious legal grounds.

In the meantime, more than forty million Americans have not had to make any payments since March 2020 and interest has not accrued on their debts, because the payment pause has been renewed eight times since it began under Trump. It won’t be renewed again.

This week, Congress raised the debt ceiling through legislation that contained a number of key Republican priorities — including affixing new work requirements to food stamps and cash assistance, an increased military budget, funding cuts to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and an end to the payment pause by August 30.

Even so, Education Secretary Michael Cardona is calling the deal a win. “I applaud @POTUS for averting a crisis with this deal and for protecting our student debt relief plan in full,” Cardona tweeted after the deal was announced. “I thank President Biden and his team for looking out for the 40 million hard-working Americans who will benefit from student debt relief and protecting our new and improved Income Driven Repayment plan. We will continue fighting for student borrowers.”

Biden’s Last Best Shot at Cancellation

Even after Biden negotiated away his power to help tens of millions of student borrowers, he can still attempt to salvage his campaign promise.

If the Supreme Court strikes down his original order, Biden can cancel debt through a different avenue known as “compromise and settlement” under the Higher Education Act of 1965. Under this authority, the education secretary can enter into settlements with debtors to lower the amount they owe or cancel their debt altogether.

Conservatives would likely bring legal challenges to this authority, too, but it might have a better shot at surviving than his original debt cancellation plan. Earlier this year, the Supreme Court denied a challenge to a compromise and settlement agreement that canceled $6 billion in debt for graduates of three for-profit schools.

Biden could also expand the existing income-driven repayment program, which allows debtors to make monthly payments based on their income and forgives their debt after a couple of decades. His Education Department is currently undergoing rulemaking for an income-driven repayment program that could reduce the monthly payments of many debtors and pave the way for full forgiveness in the long run.

This effort could also face court challenges — which is why the clock is ticking on all of these options. That’s because if Biden does attempt one of these backup plans and it gets tied up in litigation, there’s no possibility this time around to extend the payment pause as a temporary solution while waiting for a court ruling.

Gokey of the Debt Collective fears that slow-walking the first round of debt cancellation and the debt ceiling deal have defanged the executive branch of its power to cancel debt. Combined with the imminent end of the yearslong loan pause, many student debtors may end up in a worse position than when Biden took office.

Some people might end up thinking this was Biden’s plan all along.

“There is a significant portion of people who take a cynical read on this and say, ‘Biden was never serious, that this was all a con game,’” Gokey said. “We began the Biden administration with a Swiss Army Knife of tools to cancel student debt, and we could end with no legal options to cancel student debt, not just under the Biden administration but for future administrations.”

You can subscribe to David Sirota’s investigative journalism project, the Lever, here.

6 Women Found Dead in Portland Area, Prompting Concerns Deaths are Linked

A mysterious wave of tragedy struck the greater Portland area in three months. Six women under 40 have been found dead in various locations fewer than 100 miles apart. The Portland Police Bureau, alongside sheriff’s offices from Multnomah, Polk, Clark, and Clackamas counties, are currently carrying out investigations. Still, so far, the connections between the incidents have eluded them and left the community in a state of distress.

The first reported case was that of Kristin Smith, a 22-year-old from Gresham who went missing on December 22. On February 19, human remains were found near Southeast Deardorff Road and Flavel Street, and with the help of the Multnomah County medical examiner, Smith was identified on May 25. However, the exact cause of her death has not yet been determined.

On April 8, 32-year-old JoAnna Speaks of Oregon was discovered in a barn at an abandoned property in Ridgefield, Washington, about 22 miles from Portland. The Clark County Sheriff’s Office is treating the case as a homicide and believes that the body had been moved to this exact location. The county medical examiner was able to determine that Speaks’ had died as a result of head and neck trauma.

Another unfortunate incident in east Multnomah County involved 24-year-old Charity Lynn Perry. Her body was found on April 24 in a ditch at a junction near Ainsworth State Park. Perry had been spotted around Southwest Washington Street and Fourth Avenue in downtown Portland in the beginning of March. The Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office is classifying this death as suspicious.

In Southeast Portland’s Lents neighborhood, another female body was found on April 24 near Interstate 205 and Southeast Flavel Street. The Multnomah County Medical Examiners Office has requested public assistance in identifying the woman who is believed to have been between the ages of 25 and 40, of either Native American or Native Alaskan descent, had black, medium-length hair, was just over 5 feet tall, and weighed 135 pounds.

31-year-old Bridget Leann Ramsey Webster of Milwaukie was reported dead on April 30 on Harmony Road near Mill Creek in northwest Polk County. Webster was well known in the Portland metro area, particularly in the cities of Portland, Oregon City, and Milwaukie. Polk County Sheriff’s Office has deemed this case suspicious as well.

Finally, Ashley Renee Benson, 26-year-old from Portland, who had been reported missing on April 28, was found dead on May 7 in a wooded area near Southeast 174th Avenue and Alder Street in unincorporated Clackamas County. Clackamas County Sheriff’s Office is also looking into this death as suspicious.

With the tragedies of these six young women’s lives cut short, the authorities are finding the possible connections between these incidents and mitigating any fears among the public. The intense fear that clouds the greater Portland area has driven the local authorities to dedicate all available resources towards untangling this dark mystery and restoring peace of mind to the community.

Foods that Contain the Highest Amount of Pesticides

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article

The post Foods that Contain the Highest Amount of Pesticides appeared first on Global Research.