Love Triangle Leaves Two Dead

Satnam Sumal, a 55-year-old resident of Tracy, California – one of America’s 100 affluent cities according to the U.S. Census Bureau – found himself in the center of a dramatic throuple relationship gone wrong.

Sumal shared a home on Sunflower Lane in Tracy with his wife, 39-year-old Satbinder Singh, and her girlfriend, 37-year-old Nadjiba Belaidi.

On Monday, Sumal entered the Tracy Police Department and confessed to shooting both women with a .40-caliber handgun. Officers soon found the two women dead at Sumal’s residence. According to neighbors, two children under 10 resided in the home though they had not been present at the time of the shooting.

Sumal was promptly arrested and charged with two counts of murder. He is currently in the San Joaquin County Jail with no bail. Sgt. Michael Richards of the Tracy Police Department noted he’d never encountered a case like this in his two decades of law enforcement.

In a statement on Wednesday, San Joaquin County District Attorney Ron Freitas offered his sincerest condolences to the tragic loss of the victims’ families, extending the services of Victim-Witness Advocates.

Police still have yet to uncover a motive behind the love triangle murder, but it’s safe to say many living in Tracy remain in shock as the families of the victim are left to come to terms with the tragedy.

“Bold Goals”: Biden’s Executive Order Will Have Us Bioengineering Everything

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article

The post “Bold Goals”: Biden’s Executive Order Will Have Us Bioengineering Everything appeared first on Global Research.

US-backed Military Once Again Targets Deposed Pakistani PM Imran Khan

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article

The post US-backed Military Once Again Targets Deposed Pakistani PM Imran Khan appeared first on Global Research.

“The Dividing Line” the Corona War Propaganda has created

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article

The post “The Dividing Line” the Corona War Propaganda has created appeared first on Global Research.

Biden Is Selling Weapons to the Majority of the World’s Autocracies

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article

The post Biden Is Selling Weapons to the Majority of the World’s Autocracies appeared first on Global Research.

Close, but not close enough: Turkey election going to a runoff

With Turkey’s presidential election going to a runoff, what comes next?

By Associated Press

Close, but not close enough. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan received the most votes in a weekend presidential election but could not claim victory because he failed to get the majority support required for an outright win.

Preliminary results showed the longtime leader had 49.5% of the vote. His main challenger, opposition leader Kemal Kilicdaroglu, garnered 45%, according to Turkish election authorities. A third candidate, nationalist politician Sinan Ogan, received 5.2%.

The election is being followed internationally to see the future direction of Turkey. The strategically located NATO member has cultivated warm relations with Russia, become less secular and tilted toward authoritarianism under Erdogan.

Kilicdaroglu has promised to reorient the country as a democracy and is expected to adopt a more pro-Western stance.

The Supreme Electoral board said Monday the results mean Erdogan, 69, and Kilicdaroglu, 74, will compete in a runoff election on May 28. Here’s a look at Turkey’s two-round presidential election system and what happens next:

How does the two-round election work?

Erdogan, who has strengthened his grip on NATO member Turkey since first coming to national power as prime minister in 2003, succeeded in changing the country’s system of government from a parliamentary democracy to an executive presidency through a 2017 referendum.

The change, which took effect after the 2018 elections, abolished the office of the prime minister and concentrated broad powers in the president’s hands.

It was therefore decided that the head of both state and government needed to receive more than 50% of the vote to secure office in a single election. Since neither Erdogan nor Kilicdaroglu did that Sunday, the two front-runners must face each other again in two weeks, while the third candidate is out of the running.

France and some other European countries use a similar process for electing presidents.

What part does the third candidate play?

Ogan, 55, a former academic who was backed by an anti-migrant party, could become the kingmaker in the runoff now that he’s out of the race. He hasn’t yet endorsed either of the remaining candidates.

Turkish nationalists disgruntled with Erdogan but reluctant to vote for Kilicdaroglu, who had support from a six-party alliance and the pro-Kurdish People’s Democratic Party, or HDP, appear to have accounted for most of Ogan’s votes.

The far right accuses the pro-Kurdish party of having links to outlawed Kurdish militants – an accusation the party denies. Ogan has said he would not back any candidate “who doesn’t keep a distance with the terror organization.”

Soner Cagaptay, an expert on Turkey at the Washington Institute think tank, said most Ogan voters are likely to go for Erdogan whether or not their original candidate endorses the Turkish leader.

“It’s certain that Erdogan is going to sweep the second round,” Cagaptay said.

What are the likely scenarios?

Erdogan performed better than expected in the election held Sunday, and the People’s Alliance led by his party retained a majority in Turkey’s 600-seat parliament. Analysts say that gives the Turkish leader an edge in the runoff because voters may want to avoid having different factions running the executive and legislative branches.

Erdogan said as much early Monday.

“We have no doubt that the preference of our nation, which gave the majority in parliament to the People’s Alliance, will be in favor of trust and stability in the (second round),” the president told his supporters in Ankara.

Kilicdaroglu, the leader of the Republican People’s Party, or CHP, said he was certain of a second-round victory, but Sunday’s results indicate he could struggle to attract enough votes even though he was the candidate of the six-party Nation Alliance.

What to expect before the runoff

Analysts suggest the campaigning before the runoff could be brutal. Before Sunday’s vote, Erdogan disparaged the opposition as being supported by the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party, or PKK. At one rally, he showed hundreds of thousands of his supporters a faked video purporting to show a PKK commander singing an opposition campaign song.

“Information control was President Erdogan’s greatest asset in running and entering the election season. And I think his media loyal to him has successfully framed HDP support to Kilicdaroglu as ‘terrorist support,’” Cagaptay said. “That helped scare away some nationalist voters.”

Kilicdaroglu said Erdogan had failed to get the result he wanted despite slinging “slanders and insults” toward the opposition.

Analysts also warned of economic turbulence in the next two weeks. Markets were watching the elections to see if Turkey would return to more traditional economic policies, as promised by Kilidaroglu. Experts say Erdogan’s economic policies, which ran contrary to mainstream theories, led to the country’s currency crisis and soaring inflation.

The Turkish stock exchange, Borsa Istanbul BIST 100 index, dropped 6.2% at Monday’s opening before recovering some ground.

“Turkey’s political destiny remains on hold until the second round, scheduled for 28 May,” Bartosz Sawicki, market analyst at financial services firm Conotoxia, wrote in emailed comments. “(The outcome will) determine whether Turkey will continue down the path of unorthodox, imbalance-increasing policies or whether, after 20 years, it will return to a path of reform and recovery using methods more in line with economic textbooks.”

The post Close, but not close enough: Turkey election going to a runoff appeared first on World Israel News.

US general: Iron Dome ready to deploy if Ukraine asks

Israel would need to give permission for the U.S. to supply Ukraine with its Iron Dome technology.

By JNS

There is an Iron Dome ready for deployment should Ukraine request it, an American general told U.S. senators last week.

At a Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces meeting hearing testimony on missile defense activities, Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) asked why the Iron Dome air-defense system was not being used in Ukraine considering that the U.S. provided financial assistance to Israel to develop it.

“We helped pay for it. We sent something like $3 billion to Israel to develop it,” King said. “Wouldn’t this be a very important resource for the Ukrainians since their principal problem right now is missile defense?”

Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy John F. Plumb responded by saying that he was not aware that the U.S. was supplying Ukraine with the Iron Dome.

Lt.-Gen. Daniel Karbler, head of the U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command, pointed out that the U.S. has two Iron Dome batteries, with one currently available.

“The army does have one [Iron Dome battery] available for deployment if we get a request from it,” Karbler said.

The Iron Dome was developed by Israel’s Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and Israel Aerospace Industries, with the U.S. providing financial assistance for the project to the tune of $2.6 billion over the years.

Israel would need to give permission for the U.S. to supply Ukraine with its Iron Dome technology.

Iron Dome has been instrumental in protecting Israeli civilians against terrorists’ rockets from over the border. In the recent conflict with Palestinian Islamic Jihad in which nearly 1,500 rockets were fired from the Gaza Strip, Iron Dome intercepted 95% of rockets on their way topopulated areas, according to the Israel Defense Forces.

The post US general: Iron Dome ready to deploy if Ukraine asks appeared first on World Israel News.

In Turkey, the Fight for Democracy Isn’t Over

Turkey’s elections on Sunday brought incumbent Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to the cusp of another term in office. But he now faces a runoff vote, in which prodemocratic and Kurdish forces can still inflict a historic defeat upon the authoritarian president.

Supporters of the Green Left Party during an election campaign rally in Istanbul, Turkey, on Saturday, May 13, 2023. (Erhan Demirtas / Bloomberg via Getty Images)

People around the world are waking up to news that Turkey’s president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is nearly certain to spend another five years strengthening his grip on power. In Sunday’s first-round vote, Erdoğan took 49.5 percent support, while his challenger Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu received 44.9 percent. Runoff elections have been announced for May 28.

The grim situation reminds us of Turkey’s weak democratic norms and the extent of nationalist, racist, hard-right sentiments. The glimmer of hope comes from the long-harassed Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP), whose unyielding fight for progressive, democratic values has again shown its resilience.

The HDP and the associated Green Left Party joined the electoral process under extremely hostile conditions, with an autocratic regime controlling all state institutions and the press. These difficulties were well illustrated by a joint statement by election observers from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and the Council of Europe. It said that although the elections on May 14 were “well-organized” and for the most part peaceful, voters were limited in their political choices by the criminalization and imprisonment of HDP members.

The statement also pointed to the barriers imposed by Erdoğan, which massively restricted the opposition. The OSCE wrote: “Long-standing concerns about the respect of the fundamental freedoms of assembly, association and expression as well as independence of the judiciary, all key to a democratic process remained unaddressed in the election period.”

Erdoğan’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), which controls all state institutions, used calculated strategies to exclude the HDP in particular from the electoral race. As a result of the ongoing process aimed at banning the party, the HDP did not run in its own right but had to participate via the Green Left. It did this to overcome the imminent risk of closure through a politically motivated court case — a fate that has already befallen eight of its predecessors.

The HDP’s party organization was already weakened by systematic repression, which has continued uninterrupted since 2016, with more than fifteen thousand party leaders and members arrested. Right now this party has more than four thousand members languishing in jail. As for the Green Left Party, it was admitted to the electoral process very late, only once the election date had already been announced. All this is part of Erdoğan’s sophisticated efforts to deny us fair participation in the political process.

As a political structure denied virtually all resources, the Green Left Party thus entered the elections on unequal terms. Left-wing voters were able to choose either of two options — the Green Left Party or the allied Workers’ Party of Turkey (TIP), under the Alliance for Labor and Freedom. Even so, the results show that the HDP and the bloc surrounding it maintained the position they had conquered in the 2018 contest.

The HDP, through the Green Left, has once again maintained its position as the third-strongest force, both in parliament and in society. Millions of citizens in Turkey have put their trust in us to continue the struggle against autocracy and oppression and to demand a democratic and peaceful solution to Turkey’s problems. That is the work that must now be taken forward.

Systematic Offensive

If political conditions in Turkey were free and fair, the HDP would have participated with the support of more than four thousand imprisoned officials, former cochairs, deputies, co-mayors, and members. They would not have been excluded from the media in Turkey and would have been able to disseminate their ideas to society under equal conditions. This could have produced a quite different outcome, and indeed a nightmare scenario for Erdoğan.

The presidential elections themselves took place under remarkable conditions. Opposition candidate Kılıçdaroğlu of the Republican People’s Party (CHP), who was excluded from all media and state platforms, was supported by the HDP and its bloc. With this help, Kılıçdaroğlu did at least manage to force a runoff against Erdoğan. In this sense, the president’s myth of invincibility really has suffered a blow. Indeed, these are his worst-ever results in an election.

Now, we can hope that despite the extent to which voters have been manipulated by nationalist and religious rhetoric, in the second round the Turkish people will not reelect a man who has done so much harm to their country. If he does indeed return to the presidency, the people will be punishing themselves even more, and guaranteeing an even less democratic future.

Turkey has experienced all kinds of rule in its hundred-year history: everything from the secular-nationalist Kemalism of the mainstream opposition CHP to Islamism, coups, military dictatorship, and finally Erdoğan’s particular brand of increasingly Islamist and nationalist authoritarianism. The only thing that has not been tried is a consistent democracy.

Now and in coming years, Turkey must overcome its fears and dare to be democratic. The most important sources of inspiration in this regard are the HDP and Green Left Party, and the broader political approach of the Kurdish freedom movement. Despite the struggle for power between Erdoğan’s Islamist-nationalist bloc and the secular-nationalist one opposed to him, we remain the most important force struggling for democracy and a true alternative in Turkey. This means an alternative in which women, different peoples and religious groups, and all citizens can live together in peace. Telling of these values, according to the preliminary results, there are thirty-one women among the sixty-three Green Left deputies elected to parliament.

Had the authoritarian, nationalist, and patriarchal Erdoğan not spent the past decade systematically liquidating the progressive opposition, the situation would be very different today. But the final outcome will be decided in the May 28 second round. Nothing is finished yet.

Who wants to destroy Israel? You might be surprised – analysis

This is the first time in Israel’s short history that a large-scale movement has been launched using undemocratic means to overthrow a democratically elected government.

By Guy Millière, Gatestone Institute

On April 17-18, Israel observed Holocaust Martyrs’ and Heroes’ Remembrance Day. Sirens sounded across the country while people stood for two minutes of silence in remembrance of six million Jews who had been murdered. Wreaths were laid at the Yad Vashem World Holocaust Remembrance Center. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered a speech calling on Israelis for unity.

The speech, however, was apparently not heard by everyone. Protests against his government soon resumed. A week later, on April 24-25, on Memorial Day, when Israelis pay their respects to soldiers who have fallen so that Israel might live, Netanyahu once again called for unity. The next day, when Israel celebrated Independence Day, some people decided not to participate in the official ceremony and held a “protest celebration” instead.

Protests – or coup d’état?

Following the November 2022 elections, Israel has been plunged into turmoil. Massive demonstrations both in support of and against the government have been organized for weeks. Ostensibly the demonstrations are concerning a proposed judicial reform bill, but in reality appear to be about retaining or overthrowing the newly elected government.

Some demonstrators want to overthrow of the government and permanently eliminate Netanyahu from Israeli politics. Others, even more, believe he is the best prime minister to lead them through a time when the entire Muddle East, including Israel, is facing the threat of nuclear destruction from a relentless Iran.

It is the first time in Israel’s short history that a large-scale movement has been launched using undemocratic means to overthrow a democratically elected government.

It is also the first time that Israeli opposition political leaders, including former military chiefs of staff, have issued calls for civil disobedience and incited IDF reservists to not appear for duty. In a country under constant threat, such a move was considered inconceivable.

Former Prime Minister Ehud Barak, in the United Kingdom on March 27, outlined, with no visible shame, his strategy to topple Israel’s government, which he incorrectly defined as “basically a dictatorship”. For a citizen of a democratic country to go to a foreign country to say he wants to topple his own government could be considered an act of treason. Barak did not even try to hide that those who follow him are a tiny minority: 3.5% of a population, he stated, is enough to overthrow a government.

Yair Lapid, former interim prime minister until December 2022, was in New York in April, to meet the leaders of American Jewish organizations. He also urged the overthrow of Israel’s democratically elected government. ” You have a voice,” he encouraged leaders of American Jewish organizations, “and you have the right to use it.”

The leaders of a nonprofit organization, Am Echad, committed to strengthening the connection between Israel and Jews outside it, replied:

“It is disingenuous of you to accuse the government of undermining Israeli democracy and calling on American Jews to get up in arms to protect Israel from its own leadership.”

Other Israeli politicians and former military chiefs joined in. Moshe Ya’alon, a former Defense Minister and former IDF Chief of General Staff accused Netanyahu of “sacrificing democracy” and of being “ready to burn down the country and its values”. Former IDF Chief of General Staff Gadi Eisenkot that, claimed that Netanyahu and his government are “badly harming the national interests of the State of Israel”. And so on.

By contrast, Morton Klein, head of the Zionist Organization of America, said that “Lapid’s traitorous trip is a disgrace that has cemented his status as head of the ‘disloyal Opposition.’” Klein accused Lapid of “sowing anarchy and fomenting outside foreign pressures that trample upon the will of the Israeli public.”

Terrorists target a divided Israel

Palestinian terrorist organizations, meanwhile, took advantage of the disruption to kill more Jews. The year 2022 had been one the deadliest years in recent memory in Israel – which is the reason a strong government, led by Netanyahu, was elected in the first place.

For Israel’s enemies, the damage done to Israel’s international reputation is always near the top of their wish-list. The international media, always ready to show its contempt for Israel, also seems to enjoy what is happening. Articles in the European press blindly describe — incorrectly of course — the Netanyahu government as “extreme right-wing with fascist tendencies.” On March 30, journalist Joshua Leifer wrote in the Britain’s The Guardian that “Israel hasn’t been a democracy for a long time. Now, Israelis need to face this fact”. In France’s Le Monde, Netanyahu, along with cabinet ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, are described as racists and “Jewish supremacists”.

“Israeli Democracy Faces a Mortal Threat,” Israeli novelist David Grossman wrote in The Atlantic. The threat he speaks of is the Netanyahu government — which he, too, incorrectly describes as wanting to “abolish democracy.”

The new government, in fact, is trying to restore democracy – by reforming Supreme Court practices that were adopted starting in the 1990s, which allow unelected, unaccountable Supreme Court justices to deliver rulings based on “reasonableness” rather than on written law – often meaning, “whatever I think is reasonable”. Israel’s Supreme Court is currently said have “virtually limitless power’: it asserts the right to veto both political appointments and military decisions; it has no mechanism for recourse, and no requirement for “standing” — meaning that the litigant need not be directly affected by the decision, such as having a personal wrong righted. On the contrary, anyone can directly petition the Supreme Court, anytime, about anything. The last provision has opened the floodgates for lawsuits by “concerned” non-governmental organizations dissatisfied with decisions Israel has taken. In addition, sitting Supreme Court justices – not the electorate and not the parliament – have the power to approve or veto any appointment of new justices, leading to a closed “club” in which no one is flustered by dissent.

Israel’s Supreme Court currently has almost limitless power. There is no mechanism for recourse.

Economic and diplomatic pressure

As far as economic damage goes, 255 American Jewish business leaders on March 13 published an open letter saying that they “feel compelled to reevaluate their reliance on Israel as a strategic destination for investment”. On March 8, an Israeli technology company, Riskified, announced that it had decided to transfer $500 million out of the country, and offered relocation packages to staff members. On April 16, Moody’s credit rating agency downgraded the credit outlook of the Israeli economy from “positive” to “stable.” The move was seen by many as just the continuation of ongoing efforts to overthrow Israel’s government by “economic warfare”.

US President Joe Biden on March 28 harshly criticized the Israeli government. “I’m very concerned… They [members of the Israeli government] cannot continue down this road. And I’ve sort of made that clear”. He added that he will not invite Netanyahu to the White House “in the near term.”

“Israel,” Netanyahu answered, “is a sovereign country which makes its decisions by the will of its people and not based on pressures from abroad, including from the best of friends.”

The Biden Administration, staffed by many of the same people who were in the Obama Administration, has behaved as an enemy of Israel from day one. The Administration quickly restored US funding to the Palestinian Authority without asking it to stop supporting terrorism or even to stop inciting violence. The Biden Administration then opened a U.S. Office of Palestinian Affairs and installed, as “special representative for Palestinian affairs”, Hady Amr who has admitted being “inspired by the Palestinian intifada”.

The 2022 Country Report on Human Rights practices published by the US Department of State describes Israel as a country that does not respect the most essential human rights: those who wrote the report base their accusations on leftist and pro-Palestinian NGOs that are cited extensively throughout the text. The report alleges – without any reference to the threats of extermination from and terrorism perpetrated by the Palestinian Authority, Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah and, behind them all, an openly genocidal Iran — that “the Israeli government or its agents commit arbitrary or unlawful killings”, “use torture”, and practice “arbitrary arrest and detention”.

Interference in Israeli politics

Since the day Netanyahu won the Israeli elections in November 2022, the Biden Administration’s hostility toward Israel has grown and it seems now to be directly trying to bring down the Netanyahu government while supporting Netanyahu’s enemies both inside and outside Israel. The Administration uses US taxpayer money to fund the Movement for Quality Government (MQG), an Israeli NGO that organizes protests and disseminates propaganda hostile to Netanyahu and his government.

The Biden Administration has, to its credit, during the hundreds of recent missile attacks — 1,235 rockets over five days, launched at a country the size of New Jersey — said that “Israel has the right to protect itself and defend its people from indiscriminate rocket attacks launched by terrorist groups” — yet for the past two years, has done nothing to eliminate Israel’s most serious threat – Iran’s nuclear program – apart from seemingly trying to have Iran not use any nuclear weapons during the current administration’s term.

The Biden Administration has, additionally, considerably eroded America’s influence in the Middle East, thereby creating a situation of extreme peril for Israel and other erstwhile US allies in the Gulf. Biden, even during his 2020 presidential campaign, repeatedly vowed to treat Saudi Arabia as a “pariah”. Just weeks after his inauguration, the Biden Administration removed from the US list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations, the Houthis, one of Iran’s proxy militias that had been waging a civil war in Yemen for years on the way to the real target: Saudi Arabia. The Houthis reacted to this courtesy by ratcheting up attacks on Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi — while the Biden Administration refused put the Houthis back on the terror list. This rebuff was followed by the Biden Administration’s refusal to promise either that it would stop negotiating with Iran for a deal enabling the mullahs to have unlimited nuclear weapons, and fears that the US would not protect Saudi Arabia and other Arab allies in the Gulf from Iran.

Appeasing Iran

The seemingly unremitting desire of the Biden administration to reach an agreement with the Iranian regime at almost any price and to realign American foreign policy in the Middle East toward a policy led by Iran was evidently what led to Saudi Arabia’s restoration of ties with Iran. Biden’s eagerness to treat Saudi Arabia as “pariah” had turned an ally into a question mark. Meanwhile, the Iranian regime, more expansionist by the day (here, here and here) — which the Saudi regime is not — reveals that despite the decidedly unsavory murder of Osama bin Laden’s friend and Muslim Brotherhood acolyte Jamal Khashoggi, the Iranian regime is, by light years, far more dangerous to the stability of the region and beyond, as well as even more hostile to human rights (here, here, and here) than Saudi Arabia ever was.

As many of the US sanctions on Iran have been lifted, it has grown even more aggressive, accelerating its quest for nuclear weapons. Iran can now enrich uranium to 84% purity and raise it quickly to weapons-grade. Moreover, the strategic cooperation agreement signed in March 2021 between Iran and China has deepened the ties between the mullahs and the Chinese Communist Party, geopolitically and economically, to the detriment of the United States. The means of payment on which they agreed will not be the world’s reserve currency for oil, the US dollar, but instead, China’s yuan.

Iran’s mullahs also can see that the United Arab Emirates in 2021, signed a contract with the Chinese company Huawei, now building a 5G network in the Gulf state – thereby making the UAE totally vulnerable to Chinese intelligence penetration. That contract was followed by the cancellation of a $23 billion arms purchase from the United States. The mullahs also saw that the UAE Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan welcomed the deal between Saudi Arabia and them, and called it “an important step for the region towards stability and prosperity”.

As for Israel, Iran’s mullahs can see that their access to nuclear weapons is considered by Netanyahu and his government a mortal danger to Israel, and that the current turmoil in Israel might, they hope, make Israeli action against Iran more difficult.

The official Iranian media headlined statements by former Israeli PMs Barak and Lapid claiming that Israel was on the verge of collapse.

It is quite possible that Iran’s plan to “wipe Israel” off the map will never be implemented, but the mullahs’ dreams of doing so have existed since the first days of the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

Hezbollah and Hamas have “many thousands of missiles, some of them precision-guided”, and “Iran has transferred a very large number of missiles and UAVs to Syria” that “are ready to be launched .”

Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas most likely hope that a rain of missiles far more intense than that launched by Hamas in May 2021 against Israel could exhaust the stock of Iron Dome air defense interceptors. The mullahs apparently hope that such an attack would have catastrophic consequences.

If an attack were launched against Israel, China, Russia and European countries would most likely protest verbally, but would not act to defend Israel.

The mullahs probably assume that the Biden Administration, already involved in Ukraine and anticipating trouble from the Chinese Communist Party in the Indo-Pacific — such as trying to take over Taiwan – would, like Europe, fail to react. Biden, hoping to win the 2024 election, will most likely tell the cameras that “Israel has the right to defend itself” — but he would avoid intervening at all costs.

No answer given

Recently, the US removed munitions stored in Israel and shipped them Ukraine; the materiel has not been replaced. A few weeks ago, when a key official in Israel’s defense ministry was in Washington to request more American support for Israel in case the Israeli government thinks necessary to attack Iran’s nuclear program, no answer was given.

“Hezbollah, Hamas and their Iranian bosses believe they can attack Israel with impunity,” wrote Israeli journalist Caroline Glick last month.

“… Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps commander Hossein Salami, along with various Hamas and Islamic Jihad commanders and preachers, have given speeches declaring that Israel is falling apart and its destruction is imminent and calling for their jihadist forces to prepare for victory.”

In a later column, she wrote:

“With our ruling class in full revolt, Israel’s most important institutions—first and foremost, the IDF—are reeling. Our ability to defend ourselves on the battlefield and in diplomatic circles is constrained as never before. With our elites declaring our government illegitimate, and lobbying American Jews and politicians to boycott our leaders and reject the morality of the public that voted them into office, the government must fight against our enemies, against anti-Semitism, against BDS campaigns and anti-Israel propaganda machines with both hands tied behind its back, its mouth gagged while hopping on one foot. This situation is unsustainable.

“… we must find a way to restore sanity and a sense of common destiny to our national life. We don’t have a spare country. Our ruling class needs to return to its senses and remember this obvious fact.”

On April 27, hundreds of thousands of Israelis poured into Jerusalem for a rally to support the government. One protester said: ”

Who wants to destroy Israel? Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, of course, but the Israeli left today is also a danger for the country”.

“Look how much strength we have,” Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said to the crowd.

“They have the media and tycoons who finance demonstrations. We have the majority of the people, who demand and give us full backing to fix what needs to be fixed… We will not give up.”

“The land of Israel and the State of Israel are acquired through many trials and tribulations,” Netanyahu announced on April 24. “They will not overcome us; we will overcome them.”

A terrorist carried out a car-ramming attack at Jerusalem’s Mahane Yehuda market a few hours earlier. Netanyahu was talking about terrorists, but his words could be addressed to all enemies of Israel and to all those who want to destroy it.

Dr. Guy Millière, a professor at the University of Paris, is the author of 27 books on France and Europe.

The post Who wants to destroy Israel? You might be surprised – analysis appeared first on World Israel News.

Caught red-handed: Suspects tried robbing 2,000-year-old Israeli archaeological site

Looters arrested while trying to steal artifacts from Second Temple-era archaeological site in the Galilee.

By Pesach Benson, TPS

Israeli authorities caught five suspects red-handed trying to rob a 2,000-year-old antiquities site in northern Israel, the Israel Antiquities Authority announced on Monday.

The suspects were trying to rob a Roman-Byzantine site in the village of Ein Mahal, near Nazareth.

We recently noticed robbery excavations that took place illegally around the village of Ein Mahal,” said Nir Distelfeld, the inspector of the robbery prevention unit of the Antiquities Authority in the northern region.

“From that moment, we went on an operation, until we caught the robbers, the operation lasted about three weeks,” Distelfeld explained.

“We ambushed them, and as soon as we recognized that they had started digging, I called for assistance from the North District Police, and led the policeman who came to help. Together, we caught them red-handed.”

The site where the thieves tried to dig is called “Einat Shu’a”. There was a water source in the place and a large settlement around it. Around the site, the researchers identified finds from the prehistoric period to the Ottoman period, but the main settlement in the place was in the Roman-Byzantine periods. Long and branching hiding caves were also found on the site.

According to the Antiquities Authority, the hiding caves of Einat Shu’a are likely related to the Jewish revolts against the Roman Empire. Jews dug dozens of caves in the Galilee in preparation for the revolt, though the anticipated battles did not reach the region.

“Fortunately, the hiding caves, which are among the largest in the area, were not damaged during the recent robbery incidents,” Distenfeld said.

According to Distelfeld, “next to the cave were tools that the robbers planned to use – sledgehammers, hammers, quarrying tools and metal detectors. In front of the cave you can see medium-sized ancient quarrying. These were, apparently, storage cells. It is possible that the captured suspects had time to ‘clean’ the cells. These are ancient from findings before they were caught. No antiquities were found in the search of the bodies of the suspects, but the matter is under investigation.”

The post Caught red-handed: Suspects tried robbing 2,000-year-old Israeli archaeological site appeared first on World Israel News.